At the national level we theoretically need to show a continuing national programme and that we can be competitive to attract funding.

In adding the Caribbean Cup (and thus a path to the Concacaf Gold Cup) which we arguably can much further than World Cup or Olympic qualification; we for the first time, have a genuine case to make: as opposed to a world cup campaign (with qualification remote) every four years.

On the other hand, frankly speaking, there is very little infrastructure and a dearth of (financial) resources at the club level which is needed to support the national programme. Also while we still have folks voicing a generic concern about “what’s going on at the clubs” or retaining the view that only 3 or 4 local coaches are capable, its going to be tough to make a holistic case for funding.

So again a tough task….

My guess is a good run in the Caribbean Cup will be the catalyst.

Frank

This just my view but:

Unless the BFA secure more financing they may need to decide between competing in CFU competitions (including playing international friendlies) versus unofficial national team games, funding the Hogges, heck even the Clyde Best tournament (or how its run and funded) may need to re-considered.

The context is that the national programme is shifting back from the “developmental and winning losses” phase to showing that we can be competitive in the CFU.

Trying to find the right balance is going to require some tough calls….

Frank

Well done.

Next up: given finite financial resources, continuing re-engagement in the region. This may involve a hard look at the Hogges.

Frank