I

And if you’re going to quote me, use my words. I never said that, and certainly not “usual”ly.

Honesty. Try it.

Valid argument, isn’t it? More valid than the superstitious “devil” stuff religious bigots always bring up.

You can put lipstick on a pig. It is still a pig.

A) this is nonsense and
B ) what does that have to do with the topic? Procreation is not a stipulation nor a requirement for marriage.

Your assumptions:
Indentured servitude. Working for other people is not indentured servitude.
That she’s being taken advantage of.
That she’s from a place where it’s hard to survive. Ironically, that’d be where they sufficiency farm…
That she had children.
That she slaves away for hours on end (aka “a job”)
That she’s being paid a pittance.

Specific enough?

The rest of your post is just plain hate speech.

By Ian’s distorted logic it means that the above PLP politicians, all whom of whom have actually led the Progressive Labour Party, must have been members of this “pop culture machine”, who were pushing the gay agenda, and contributing to the moral decay and perversion that Ian writes about.

Strange because I’ve always looked upon Freddie Wade and Dame Lois Browne-Evans as bastions of democracy and equal rights. Is it just possible that equal rights for all means exactly what it says – EQUALITY FOR ALL!

You keep changing your position when I show where it’s weak, which is fine, but the problem is that you’re acting like these new positions aren’t changes.

Your whole “farming and fishing” thing is ridiculous and impossible and simply won’t work.
That’s not “my bias”, it’s simply reality.

The rest of your post is just more sick rationalization for hate.

The “gay agenda” is simply “being treated equally”.

But, to humour you, what is this “pop culture machine” you’re talking about? Who’s behind it? What is their purpose?

No surprises there.

Fairylands and Tuckers Town as farmers and fishermen?
Huh?

And the end of capital punishment was locally driven.
You are incorrect.

Comprende? You can’t just make stuff up and present it as fact.

Really? Would that include everyone that has children without getting married first?

We’ve been VERY successful, traditionally and historically, with our two legs: IB and Tourism. There is absolutely no reason not to try to go back to that.

“Waiting to catch the crumbs falling off the rich mans table”?

Come on. With that attitude, you’ll never get ahead, no matter if we pursue IB and Tourism or, as you bizarrely suggest, fishing and farming as a community. Oh, wait. You backtrack on that and then say it should be individuals and families…
We’re not talking about individuals taking care of themselves. We’re talking about a national program to get our economy back on track.

You said “ending capital punishment”… WE did that.
The Governor’s comments have nothing to do with something we already did a long time ago.

Doesn’t make it true.

Nor does it make it anything but hate, bigotry and lies, as I said in my first post.

Sadly, you quick willingness to congratulate the OBA, you miss the fact that the premier doesn’t know what he is talking about and is confusing some basic facts.

Don’t get too far ahead of yourself.

To the general populace the bluster is great, as a Bermudian I love it, but a neutral observer would be left to say that he doesn’t know what he is talking about.

Can you imagine Paula Cox doing this? – she could barely string a sentence together.

Now seriously sage, you think Bermudians gonna work the land or fish the seas in large numbers?

“Asked for his own opinion on same-sex marriage, Mr Bean maintained that it and the “agenda of same-sex marriage” represented “an attack on the foundation of civilisation and on life itself, and that’s the family unit”.”

See how easy that was?

Do you think Mr. Cameron will speak to Mr. Cannonier like this reporter did? If not, why would “PCC” speak to him “in such a manner”?