Comments on: Trespassing Charges Dismissed Against Davis

By: Lang

Lang — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:07:34 +0000

Imagine turning cap lock off and learning how to spell.

By: LiveLaughLife

LiveLaughLife — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:01:05 +0000

He was paid off in full 15 years ago, but still doesn’t comprehend that it isn’t his home anymore.

By: COUSIN AND KNOW THE TRUTH TWO

COUSIN AND KNOW THE TRUTH TWO — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:04:40 +0000

THIS IS RIDICULOUS IT HAS BEEN OVER 15 YEARS THAT HE HAD BEEN PAID AND WHAT HE CHOSE TO DO WITH THE MONEY HE GOT WAS ON HIM AND IF YOU ALL ONLY KNEW THE DRAMA HE HAS CAUSED ALL THESE YEARS YOU WOULD AGREE THAT HE NEEDS TO BE LOCKED UP AND THROW AWAY THE KEY HE NEEDS TO JUST LEAVE HER THE HELL ALONE SO GOOOOO AWAAAYYYYYY FOREVER IMAGINE LOOKING OVER YOUR SHOULDER ALL THESE YEARS JUS CRAZZZZZYYYYYYY

By: VJ

VJ — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:18:41 +0000

I agree with the last two comments. How can you trespass on your own property? It seems very unfair for a co-owner to be banned from a home he owns. Unless he is abusive and a threat to his wife, then this is a matter for the matrimonial/civil courts. It is not a matter for the criminal courts, and was rightfully dismissed.

By: boogiedownproductions

boogiedownproductions — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:52:08 +0000

knowing da truth and not knowing is what needs to be understood…. if ya been paid what do you own there … get the facts first

By: YADON

YADON — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:35:53 +0000

So the man that has probably worked his whole life for that house should just be homeless now, whilst the women gets everything. Sounds fair

By: Impressive

Impressive — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:32:49 +0000

i agree, however it states that he is a co=owner of the property. I don’t know all the details apart from what is provided above, but to pay a mortgage on a property that you are not allowed to enter would be very hard for me to accept. (just being honest)

By: Time Shall Tell

Time Shall Tell — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:11:50 +0000

Wait, he co-owns the property but is not allowed on his property? The wife should have to buy him out if she doesn’t want him on the property.

By: Paul Riviere

Paul Riviere — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:26:21 +0000

So DBL you are assuming that the XWife has ownership of the premises. That’s whats wrong with the courts and society, just give the woman everything, even if it belonged to the husband prior or was purchased together.
My X tried that and got ZERO, nadda, nothing, zilch.
She didn’t put a dime in, so she didnt deserve a dime when she went a steppin.
Check ya sorry arse later, but not on my dime.

By: Vested

Vested — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:09:41 +0000

He owns 50% of that property…why should he be inclined to not be on it? She can’t afford to buy him out then makes up some trump charge of abuse / needing restraining order…we do not have the whole story…

By: DBL

DBL — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:34:53 +0000

When a man and woman are no longer married they need to leave that person alone. One should not have to get a letter for no trespassing. Those letters do not work effectively. The courts are too lenient.