That said, it would be rich for PLP supporters to complain after the whole mess with the Progressive Minds blog.

Oh, wait, I hit on the right word… stall.

And who is deciding the PLP’s government relation policy right now, Mr. Bean who vowed not to collaborate with the government demons, or Mr. Brown who wants collaboration… appears a little of the plaster has fallen off the PLP walls and the cracks in their foundation that have always been there are showing.

that’s messed up

As it stands a good government requires good opposition but the issues that they conflict on shouldn’t be petty “He said, she said” & definitely shouldn’t reach the point of low dragging through the dirt politics. It seems both parties have been more engaged in childish antics (both sides) rather then working in the people’s favor. Both sides have “some” great people with great potential representing their respective parties but it means nothing since both parties are being dogged down in mutual pettiness. Work as hard for the people as you do bickering among yourself & just imagine how far we as a whole could be…

I see Cayman has done something to improve their economy instead of sitting around on their collective a$$es and throwing around race cards…

Did you respond by saying “This particular piece of legislation I do not have a problem with.’

Is the following true, “You can’t misconstrue that in any way. I wrote it down and he saw me writing it down.” Did you see the Premier taking notes during your meeting?

Is this true Mr. Brown? Did you say those words? Stop deflecting and answer the question. If so, then why would you carry on with your protest march despite the fact that you have no qualms over this piece of legislation? Why do you think it is ok to use your supporters’ emotions against a law that you stated you have no issue against? Why did no PLP Senator vote against the legislation?

“Second: Mr. Brown said he left the meeting with “no clear commitment to a bi-partisan effort” and yet, in the next sentence, he said the Premier and his minister “did commit to engage in a process with the PLP… to see if we could come to agreement over key principles that would shape a collaborative undertaking.” He added that I’d asked him “to set out [his] views on some key guiding principles.”

So why would you carry on with a march, citing no collaboration, despite the fact that the Premier stated the above (your words remember)?

Your own leader has stated many times that he has no time for the OBA and that there would be no collaboration with the OBA. Who is actually in charge at Alaska Hall these days? Cause it seems to me you are overriding your leaders view.

OBA has shown their true faces over the past year. Believe them, they will not change now…. Transparency and Honesty is not apart of who they really are….

…

Mr. Brown you’re a man of good intentions, purpose and
integrity, but there are those that do not operate under the same high levels of trustworthiness and honesty as you do.
Dunkley and Fahy do not and their past behaviours are evident of that.

Dunkley now is showing the public more and more he is not such that nice man in a good suit. The real Dunkley is now slowly revealed to the public. Some have been blindsighted for a time now.

Unfortunately MP Brown, due to your kind and honest nature you went into the meeting trusting that they would do good for the people. But Mr. Brown, did you forget the actions of the OBAubp over the past several years. They have used tape recorders and all kinds of tricks during one-on-one meetings. The
past history of the OBA speaks volumes in terms of their lack of Honesty and Transparency. Mr. Brown, lesson learnt……do not walk into the room alone with these MPs they have shown their true colours over and over again. Not sure a real Leopard can change his stripes

Stand strong Brown…..Immigration Reform is a MUST.

I also notice that Brown does not specifically deny that he said he did not have any particular problem with the specific legislation.

How foolish to believe Mr. Dunkley and Fahy. It just does not add up. Mr. Dunkley looks to be talking from both sides of his mouth.

WHY?

Why would Mr. Brown present a brilliant presentation in the House of Assembly on Immigration Reform, if he agreed with Mr. Dunkley? Why would Mr. Brown push for a “bi-partisan committee” to address “Comprehensive Review of Immigration” in Bermuda? Why would Mr. Brown push to “Educate folks on Immigration” historically in Bermuda? Why would organize a “protest” and go on the Sherri J Show to talk about the importance of Immigration reform? It does not add up for him to now agree with Dunkley/Fahy. He has done too much in his stand on Immigration Reform to now turn around and agree with Dunkley not too do it. Mr. Brown has been pushing for Immigration Reform for sometime in Bermuda now, but it has been rejected by the OBA over and over again.

The truth no matter how some attempt to reject it is that Mr. Dunkley is not been honest. He far from Transparency as has been proven by this OBA government over the past 2 years. OBA’s actions has validated such, and is evident they are not serious about the People’s business of this country.

Mr. Brown spoke on the Sherri J show in regards to the protest, so how could one now claim they did not know…..really…..

“He said, ‘This particular piece of legislation I do not have a problem with.’ You can’t misconstrue that in any way. I wrote it down and he saw me writing it down.”

I would. Particularly when my other choice is Walton Brown- a member of the “we had to deceive you” party