But to answer your questions, something you continue to refuse to do:

The origins of marriage are property consolidation.

The purpose of marriage is to give someone outside the family a set of rights afforded to a family member.

You have no point, so no, it’s not getting through. You keep moving the goalposts.

It doesn’t affect you, so why keep fighting it?

And literally, the definition of “Right” is “Not Wrong”. This sentence is gibberish.

And “The Devil” is a religious construct and we’ve discussed that. You were lying when you said it’s not about religion, weren’t you?

As has been suggested many, many times, to you personally, why don’t you do the same?

It works.

So Male & Female, Female & Female and Male & Male all come under a banner of a social construct

What is the origins of marriage?
What is the purpose of marriage?

I truly feel there needs to be a change and I know my point is getting through

SSM does not affect, effect or impact ME in any way

Because You think that it is ‘Not Wrong’ does NOT mean that it is ‘Right’

“Religious people will have their say but the Devil will have his Way!!!”

It was nonbinding and unanswered and thus using the results as any sort of indicator of anything is wrong. That’s literally what those words mean.

Oh, wait. You don’t care. You have an agenda of discrimination to push, so anything that even looks like it backs you up is fair game, even if it’s false as heck.
Kinda like when you said “It’s not about religion, it’s just unnatural…” and then ran away when it was pointed out that you were wrong… or when you said you’d answer questions, then disappeared from THAT conversation.

What’s sad is that you don’t even see that you’re being used by a foreign hate group…

Unless you actually ARE part of that foreign hate group… Hmm… that’s something to think about.

Spouting unBermudian things… doesn’t understand how our laws work… hmmmm

I’m just not for supremacy, like you are.

I believe there’s room for all human sexualities (And no, paedophilia isn’t a sexuality, nor is incest, before someone pipes in with those tired attempts at an argument). You just think there’s only room for yours.

That’s why you’re wrong. As usual.

And the people DID decide. We agreed on a set of rules that protect us all.

one of those rules is ““…Parliament cannot impose the religious preferences of any one group on the society as a whole through legislation of general application.”

Now, unless you want to repeal that and put us all in danger of a theocracy, you gotta stop with this ridiculous “Let the people decide” nonsense.

We have spoken and we, as a society and as a community, have decided that it is important to protect ourselves from the religious preferences of any one group.

Now, if you have an argument that ISN’T religiously based… an honest argument that can’t be debunked within seconds or already has been shown to be false… then let’s have it.

Until then, you’re howling like a lunatic about things you willfully refuse to understand.

I CALL FOR A BINDING REFERENDUM

•the numbers (that voted) for, minority

•the numbers (that voted) against, majority

95%

Then why are you doing your usual stunt interjecting about your favorite subject ‘herb’ ?

You didn’t have much to say the other day on the article ‘elsewhere’ written by an expert who debunked your constant whining that it’s never hurt anyone.

You can’t. Because I didn’t.

You are spreading lies in your desperation.

You know you are wrong – it’s been exposed many, many times – and now you are desperately trying to defame me with this ridiculous “heterophobia” gibberish.

Pathetic.

Any proposal you put forth against Marriage Equality – unless you offer a valid, non-religious reason for it, which you can’t because there is none… if there was, you would have offered it by now… we’ll, not YOU, but someone sane – is against the law and thus will be shot down.
It’s happened twice now. It has been shown that you and people that think like you are wrong. Completely wrong.

Don’t blame me for your ridiculous, illegal ideas.

You want another referendum ? Fine , just make sure it’s only valid if 95% of the electorate participate .

SSM feel free to pick a number and have a seat until YOUR number is called

I CALL FOR A BINDING REFERENDUM!!!

I CALL FOR A BINDING REFERENDUM

Thank You Mike Hind for the tip

I CALL FOR A BINDING REFERENDUM

Thank You Mike Hind for the tip

Preserve Marriage is SOLELY about stopping Marriage Equality.
This has nothing to do with strong marriages. If it was, they’d support more loving couples getting married.

They are backed and guided by an anti-LGBT group, NOM.

And not ONCE have they offered a valid, legal reason for their support of denying people equal access to rights. Not once.

They’ve lied, they’ve misrepresented themselves and the truth, they’ve made completely spurious claims, over and over again.

Your claim of Preserve Marriage’s goals is completely untrue.

Have you organized like pro marriage equality folks have?
What organization have you formed, what messaging have you put out to promote your cause?

None. Because you just want to complain about gay folks getting equality.

It’s an easy excuse.

You don’t want to do the work. You just want to complain about how hard you have it.

Grow up.

“…Parliament cannot impose the religious preferences of any one group on the society as a whole through legislation of general application.”

They have never offered a reason to deny people equal access to rights provided by marriage and have, in fact, been exposed as backed by a foreign group, NOM.

Secondly, if this group is so hot about the sanctity of marriage why are they not putting a heck of a lot more energy into sounding off about the infidelity of husbands/wives which runs quite rampant?

From my observations that seems to be a far more serious problem that they should be focusing on.

Democracy doesn’t exist as majority will, if first and foremost all are not given legal equality under which they can be governed… without those constitutional protections of legal equality, majority will rule isn’t democracy, but in fact totalitarianism.

Maybe if we had actually more “marriages” we wouldn’t have the social ills that we do . Get what I’m saying ?
Lets see you and PM have the ba@@s to address that issue !

So , tell us how old you were when you made the choice to be hetero ?

We’re all patiently waiting .