Comments on: No Arrests In Roadside Sobriety Checkpoints

By: Toodle-oo

Toodle-oo — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:33:26 +0000

*intoxicated dangerous criminals behind the wheel who have absolutely no care or consideration for their or anyone else’s safety*

And that includes everyone DUI of any mind altering drug . You keep acting like booze is the only one and you know better.

By: sage

sage — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:37:56 +0000

You mean to say they didn’t intercept any intoxicated dangerous criminals behind the wheel who have absolutely no care or consideration for their or anyone else’s safety and put their “right to drink” above human lives despite hundreds of people driving in this condition then fining them less than offenses which present no danger to anyone.

By: mumbojumbo

mumbojumbo — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 16:23:26 +0000

Well…we had Santah drivin upn’down South Shore Warwick last night…full hot!
He was in that fire truck …sirens blarring….Ho Ho Ho!!! this way…ho ho ho!!! that way…no body messes with Santa…

By: Fed Up

Fed Up — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:48:10 +0000

Yes there were custodial arrests. The term “custodial” refers to the suspect being in custody. It doesn’t necessarily mean handcuffs. Rather, it means that the police have deprived the suspect of his or her freedom of action in any significant way. A traffic stop an “arrest” within the meaning of Miranda? ) “Interrogation” means questioning.

By: Fed Up

Fed Up — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:44:15 +0000

You mean to say the government didn’t make any money off of soft targets. Oh man!

By: StanTheMaintenanceMan

StanTheMaintenanceMan — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 01:54:17 +0000

Nope. They just get drunk earlier before stops.

By: sage

sage — Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:40:42 +0000

Look at that, Bermudians have stopped drinking and driving in just 3 months!