<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RA: New Renewable Energy Feed-In-Tariff Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bernews.com/2019/10/ra-new-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bernews.com/2019/10/ra-new-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff-rate/</link>
	<description>Bermuda&#039;s #1 source for 24/7 breaking news, photos &#38; videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>https://bernews.com/2019/10/ra-new-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff-rate/#comment-5123243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2019 10:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernews.com/?p=918437#comment-5123243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news but still not enough, RA.  I would like to see it almost on par with what we pay in electricity $0.44 kWh, which is similar to the feed in tariff pricing they have in Europe.  

Why should my panels on my roof which produce excess power when I am not home make a 50% profit for BELCO to sell to another customer who is just next door?  All BELCO had to do was distribute it.  The feed in tariff should be an incentive, not a deterrent!  With storage prices plumetting, there is more incentive for me to buy a home battery to keep my excess energy and if everyone does this who has panels, it will spell the death spiral of the utility.  Change is coming.  Power to the people!

RA, we are paying your department enormous amounts of money to represent us, the the public, and you need to take another look at the feed in tariff because something is still not right!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news but still not enough, RA.  I would like to see it almost on par with what we pay in electricity $0.44 kWh, which is similar to the feed in tariff pricing they have in Europe.  </p>
<p>Why should my panels on my roof which produce excess power when I am not home make a 50% profit for BELCO to sell to another customer who is just next door?  All BELCO had to do was distribute it.  The feed in tariff should be an incentive, not a deterrent!  With storage prices plumetting, there is more incentive for me to buy a home battery to keep my excess energy and if everyone does this who has panels, it will spell the death spiral of the utility.  Change is coming.  Power to the people!</p>
<p>RA, we are paying your department enormous amounts of money to represent us, the the public, and you need to take another look at the feed in tariff because something is still not right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 29/31 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 450/453 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cloudfront.bernews.com

Served from: bernews.com @ 2026-04-09 02:02:32 -->