Comments on: Premier: Report Of COI Into Historic Land Losses

By: Toodle-oo

Toodle-oo — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:42:10 +0000

What difference does it make to you ? You have your one party state which is exactly what you’ve always wanted .
For you any opposition is irrelevant no matter how good or electable they are .
Wait for the day when your plp comes after you for the $100,000 you owe them . Any opposition then will look good unless you have sawdust for brains.

By: Wing nut

Wing nut — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 19:18:21 +0000

While the debt keeps climbing.. just a couple trinkets

By: White Wash

White Wash — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:58:34 +0000

I think the right wing of the voters are still looking for a real opposition party to replace the pathetic ubp/oba first.

By: Wing nut

Wing nut — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:44:51 +0000

Are we still investigating the unknown entertainer?? Or did that leave with the police commissioner..

By: Ringmaster

Ringmaster — Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:28:02 +0000

Plus the Cement Company.

By: Toodle-oo

Toodle-oo — Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:26:07 +0000

“Government ensures that the history of the Tucker’s Town and St. David’s Island expropriations are memorialized suitably , etc ”

And what about the people who also lost property due to military requirements in Prospect and other parts of Devonshire , Boaz Island and Morgan’s point ? No thoughts about them ?

By: Ringmaster

Ringmaster — Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:30:18 +0000

A telling reaction to this COI findings compared to the last covering the alleged misappropriation of funds. Those findings included sufficient evidence to commence a lawsuit against a sitting PLP MP allegedly involving tens of millions of dollars. A lawsuit quietly swept under the table in 2017. Wouldn’t those tens of millions of dollars be useful to pay for the incinerator repairs instead of blaming the OBA?