Go read that…as a sample…the notes under Table 13 explains why your analysis may be flawed.

If you refuse to believe the evidence you’re being shown, we aren’t going to agree.
I showed you UK HSA stats. They clearly show that vaccinated people are testing positive at far greater per capita rates than non-vaccinated people.
There are certainly medical reasons why this might be the case, but you can’t get past your closed-minded beliefs.

“Vaccination continues to prevent a high number of cases resulting in severe disease, hospitalisation and death and remains the best way to protect us all.”

Dr Mary Ramsay, Director of Clinical Programmes at the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), said:

“The continued fall of COVID-19 hospital admissions and acute respiratory infections remains encouraging and demonstrates that vaccines are providing strong protection against severe illness.”

Give it up.

The vaccine makes risk of transmission lower, chance of catching it lower, and if you do catch it, less impact and reduced chance of death.

That has always been the argument. To say taking the vaccine increases your chance of catching COVID is frankly stupid. The stats do not support that.

“ the pro vax lobby (if there is such a thing) has never made such a wild claim that vaccination makes you immune to infection.”
Well, they actually pretty much did make that claim until recently, that the vaccine is highly protective against infection, etc. But that ship has obviously sailed. The vaccine at best makes no difference to whether someone tests positive. And the UK HSA numbers suggest the vaccine makes it significantly more likely.

Chance of infection is only increased among the vaccinated because more people are vaccinated, and in fact, the pro vax lobby (if there is such a thing) has never made such a wild claim that vaccination makes you immune to infection.

Copied fro the report itself:

“ Although individuals may not develop symptoms of COVID-19 after vaccination, it is possible that they could still be infected with the virus and could transmit to others. Understanding how effective vaccines are at preventing infection is therefore important to predict the likely impact of the vaccination programme on the wider population. In order to estimate vaccine effectiveness against infection, repeat asymptomatic testing of a defined cohort of individuals is required. Studies have now reported on vaccine effectiveness against infection in healthcare workers, care home residents and the general population with the Alpha and Delta variants (155 to 18). Generally estimates are similar to or slightly lower than vaccine effectiveness estimates against symptomatic disease and there is evidence of significant waning in protection against infection over time. Estimates for vaccine effectiveness against infection with the Omicron variant are not yet available”

Bu that’s not what you said … you said the vaccinated are more likely to catch COVID.

Understanding the excess mortality:

Excess mortality includes deaths attributable directly to COVID-19 that were counted and reported to WHO by countries.
It also includes deaths attributable directly to COVID-19 that were not counted or reported by countries.
It also includes deaths indirectly associated with COVID-19, due to other causes and diseases, resulting from the wider impact of the pandemic on health systems and society.
It is minus any deaths that would have occurred under normal circumstances but were averted due to pandemic-related changes in social conditions and personal behaviors e.g. less traffic deaths or influenza deaths due to local lockdowns and less travel.

That said, not sure of the point you are trying to make.

You been reading obscure blogs from internet physicians again?

Dr Muge Cevik, a clinical lecturer in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St Andrews, previously told Reuters that when much TV in of a population has been vaccinated, “most infections and deaths are expected to be among those vaccinated”

The UKHSA also says the prioritisation of individuals who are more at risk of severe COVID-19 in vaccine rollouts means those vaccinated may be more at risk of death from COVID-19 and contributing factors, regardless of vaccination.

Further detail on the effectiveness of two COVID-19 vaccine doses on preventing death is also available within the “vaccine effectiveness” section of the surveillance report. It says that after 25 weeks following the second dose, “vaccine effectiveness was around 60% while at 2 or more weeks following a booster vaccine effectiveness was 95% against mortality”.

You cannot draw any conclusion from the data provided that indicates that infection is more likely amongst the vaccinated as a result of vaccination. It simply does not say that.

Nothing.

We know, for example, that as an airborne virus air filtration can remove almost all traces – this is from research done in Cambridge. We know, that despite those screaming about “freedumb”, that wearing PPE can help protect against viral spread.

We also know that those vaccinated carry a lower viral load.

You might be falling into the trap of focussing on a single published paper that supports your hypothesis. It’s statistically anecdotal at best.

We all know COVID measures were all about not overloading the hospital, and by and large, they were successful. But now is the time to stop.

Please provide hyper-links to that evidence. I have not seen it.

I trust you are referring to peer-reviewed articles by recognised experts.

This is right up there with the overwhelming evidence of the existence of a god.

Right back at you.

Covid: World’s true pandemic death toll nearly 15 million, says WHO

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-61327778

But be clear they are putting themselves, and those around them, at greater risk by not doing so. COVID remains highly contagious and for some, unfortunately, deadly. Vaccination reduces viral load, reduces chance of contraction, transmission and serious complications from COVID.

So you are wrong and dare I say it, just a little dim witted.

Have you seen the numbers being reported in the UK? And I mean the numbers that suggest about 17,000 people died from COVID ONLY. The rest of the reported 175,000 deaths were all co morbidity with many cases contracted AFTER going into hospital.

It has been over for a long time, you just keep believing what you are told by those with agendas.

The TA is an arrival tax, the PLP and their complicit civil service have all but admitted that.

It doesn’t sound like its over … or “only Omicron”.

The form stops nothing. It is, as he has stated, a money making annoyance to anyone travelling to Bermuda, whether local returning home or someone who wants to visit.

A few months ago the Minister was insisting that the numbers were dropping when, in fact they were increasing. Back then we had about 20 cases per day. We are back to averaging just a smidgen under 50 cases a day.

Go figure.