Moody’s Downgrades Bank Of Butterfield
Shortly after Moody’s announced they downgraded Bermuda’s rating to Aa3 and changed the outlook to negative earlier today [May 16], they confirmed they downgraded the ratings of the Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited. The rating outlook is stable.
A statement from the ratings agency said, “The downgrade reflects Butterfield’s still-high level of nonperforming assets (NPAs) and the limited prospect of it improving in the near- to medium-term given Bermuda’s ongoing recession.
Moody’s said that Butterfield’s stable outlook reflects its strong capital position, which supports creditors and serves to mitigate some of the risk related to the bank’s concentrations and its weak asset quality.
The statement from Moody’s is below:
Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the ratings of The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (Butterfield). Butterfield’s standalone bank financial strength rating/baseline credit assessment was downgraded to D+/baa3 from C-/baa2.
The bank’s long-term deposit rating was downgraded to A3 from A2 and its short-term rating to Prime-2 from Prime-1. The rating outlook is stable. This concludes the review for downgrade that was initiated on 3 April 2013.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The downgrade reflects Butterfield’s still-high level of nonperforming assets (NPAs) and the limited prospect of it improving in the near- to medium-term given Bermuda’s ongoing recession. The high level of NPAs is the result of the bank’s large concentration in Bermuda real estate and its sizable exposures to single credits. Moody’s added that the downgrade reflects Butterfield’s relatively weak profitability, which will likely remain constrained because of low interest rates and the possibility of further credit costs.
Despite these challenges, Moody’s said that Butterfield’s stable outlook reflects its strong capital position, which supports creditors and serves to mitigate some of the risk related to the bank’s concentrations and its weak asset quality. However, Moody’s does not expect significant improvement in Butterfield’s capital position given its limited ability to generate capital internally.
Butterfield’s deposit and debt ratings benefit from systemic support, and incorporate a three-notch lift, based on the Government of Bermuda’s Aa3 government bond rating. Moody’s believes that Butterfield enjoys a very high probability of systemic support, a view that was validated by the Government’s announcement in 2009 that it would guarantee Butterfield’s $200 million preferred stock issue and purchase any preferred stock that was not placed with investors.
The downgrade of Butterfield’s government-guaranteed preferred stock rating from Aa2 (hyb) to Aa3 (hyb) is directly linked to the downgrade of the Bermuda government’s bond rating from Aa2 to Aa3 on 16 May 2013. The preferred stock rating outlook is negative, consistent with the negative outlook on the Bermuda government’s bond rating.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Moody’s Consolidated Global Bank Rating Methodology published in June 2012. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited, headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, reported assets of $8.9 billion at 31 March 2013.
Could some international bank please bail these sorry b*%$ards out?
They already have – CIBC and Carlyle are the only reason Butterfield didn’t go under in the first place.
can one of you financial smartazzes that walk around town in your $400 dollar Amani Suits tell me how BNTB can post profits and still be downgraded because of a few NPAs? Moody and the rest of that lot are full of bullshyte! kinda remind me of the speculators that drive up the price of oil
I believe an Armani suit will set you back $1,800 at retail
The few NPAs as you say is the banks high concentration in Bermuda real estate
Bermudians enjoy debating these topics but only amongst themselves which eases the pains of dealing with reality.
Moody’s is an objective financial observer and I wouldn’t be surprised if they see a complete flat line in the local real estate market in the next 12 to 18 months thus the downgrade
thanks for correcting ‘Armani’ spelling and price. Perhaps there are better days ahead once we see the money flowing through here again (fingers xxxxx-ed)
you mean years not months?