Bill Paves Way For Gambling Referendum
A date for the referendum on gambling to be held under the provisions of the Referendum bill passed in the House last night will be “determined and announced in the near future,” Premier Paula Cox said.
The Premier was speaking in the House of Assembly yesterday [June 8] on the Referendum Act 2012. Premier Paula Cox tabled the Bill on May 18, saying it would be followed by a referendum on gaming in Bermuda in due course.
Yesterday Premier Cox said, “The Referendum Act 2012 establishes the framework for putting power in people’s hands. Democracy is not a spectator sport. Democracy is not so much a form of government as it is a set of principles.
Premier Cox said the referendum will be administered using the same arrangements as for general elections, bye-elections and municipal elections, as co-ordinated by the Parliamentary Registrar. The poll and the count will be managed in the same way as for other elections.
The Bill provides for only registered voters to participate in a referendum, and provision will be made for advanced polls for the sick, infirm and absent voters.
“A referendum question shall be answered in the affirmative if 50% or more of all qualified voters have voted in the referendum and more than 50% of the ballots are of the same response,” said Premier Cox.
“In Bermuda’s recent past, only 2 referendums have been held, one on the matter of capital punishment and the other on the matter of independence. In both cases separate legislation was drafted specifically for the purpose of holding a referendum, that is to say, the Capital Punishment Referendum Act 1989 and the Independence Referendum Act 1995.”
The Premier said the Bill provides a “sound framework for holding any referendum including the referendum to be held on gaming as promised in the 2011 Throne speech.”
“Gambling is one such example where you can pick up the newspapers, read the blogs or listen to the talk shows and hear opinions from gambling being the panacea for Bermuda to gambling being the downfall of Bermudians.
“These important issues normally represent seismic shifts in our culture and way of life and, therefore, these are the issues that we need to take directly to our people to hear what they have to say.”
“A date for the first referendum to be held under the provisions of this Bill will be determined and announced in the near future.”
Premier Cox’s full statement follows below:
Mr. Speaker,
The Referendum Act 2012 establishes the framework for putting power in people’s hands.
Democracy is not a spectator sport. Democracy is not so much a form of government as it is a set of principles.
“Democracy is based upon the conclusion that there are extraordinary possibilities in ordinary people” Harry Emerson Fosdick
This is consistent with comments made by Franklin D. Roosevelt who said: “Let us never forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President and senators and Congressman and government officials, but the voters of this country.”
The Referendum Act 2012 is a forward-thinking piece of legislation. It anticipates the possibilities for referendums to be held. It sets out the general parameters under which individual referendums can be held. So there will be no need to customise and to construct separate legislation for each time a referendum is to be held.
With the framework for holding referendums as set out in this Bill, it means that only mini-bills will need to be created to identify the specifics of a referendum, including the wording of the referendum question.
The provisions for the holding of a referendum must be trusted and clear.
It is about giving power to the people when there is the determination to go to the people with a referendum question.
What is also important as a principle underpinning the referendum is that of informed choice. The Office of the Parliamentary Registrar will be instrumental in ensuring that voters have the information they need to participate in the referendum and in order to make an informed choice.
The referendum will be administered using the same arrangements as for general elections, bye-elections and municipal elections, as co-ordinated by the Parliamentary Registrar.
The poll and the count will be managed in the same way as for other elections, with returning officers. Returning officers and the election officials and the detailed rules of conduct of the poll will be based on those applying to the conduct of all elections in Bermuda. There is no mystery.
The referendum process is based on tried and true electoral processes. It is a process that is beyond reproach. The Government is committed to a referendum process that is conducted to the highest standards of fairness, transparency and propriety. We recognise that when you put power in the people’s hands it has to be clear and readily understood.
Given the similarities in operational methodology between conducting a general election and conducting a referendum, the Parliamentary Election Act 1978 was used as the basis for this Referendum Bill. However, not every section of the Parliamentary Election Act needed to be included.
In Bermuda’s recent past, only 2 referendums have been held, one on the matter of capital punishment and the other on the matter of independence. In both cases separate legislation was drafted specifically for the purpose of holding a referendum, that is to say, the Capital Punishment Referendum Act 1989 and the Independence Referendum Act 1995.
The process used for carrying out the referendums was similar to that of holding a general election and both Acts applied the provisions of the Parliamentary Election Act 1978 with modifications, to the holding of each referendum.
The Bill speaks to the process of holding a referendum, inclusive of the issuance of a Notice and the provision to postpone a referendum. Mr. Speaker the Bill provides for only registered voters to participate in a referendum.Provision is also made, for advanced polls for the sick, infirm and absent voters. The duties of Returning Officers remain consistent with those duties in the general election process, which include inter alia, receiving parliamentary registers, the authority to appoint presiding officers and the authority to have persons removed from the area because of misconduct.
The procedures for voting in a referendum are laid out with specificity in order to avoid any confusion. The same standards of ethical behaviour and secrecy required during and after an election also apply to holding a referendum.
The criteria for determining the results of the referendum are also included. A referendum question shall be answered in the affirmative if 50% or more of all qualified voters have voted in the referendum and more than 50% of the ballots are of the same response.
Mr. Speaker, the Referendum Bill 2012 gives the Premier the ability to establish an ad hoc committee comprised of a chairperson, a lawyer and three members of the Legislature who will be responsible for advising the Premier, establishing best operational practices and ensuring public awareness of the question or questions for consideration.
This means that the Committee can make recommendations for educational campaigns prior to the referendum so that the public has a better understanding of how the referendum process works, how a ballot is to be marked and more importantly, what the referendum issues and implications are.
Mr. Speaker, in summary, the Referendum Bill 2012 provides a sound framework for holding any referendum including the referendum to be held on gaming as promised in the 2011 Throne speech. The Bill also provides that the Premier shall publish a referendum notice appointing the day for the referendum.
Mr. Speaker, this is a watershed moment that demonstrates that this Government is of the people and listens to the people.
Mr. Speaker, there are a number of issues where there are a number of diverse opinions and where Honourable Members will normally vote their conscience. While that is a good thing, there are some issues where our personal beliefs may not mirror that of our constituents.
Gambling is one such example where you can pick up the newspapers, read the blogs or listen to the talk shows and hear opinions from gambling being the panacea for Bermuda to gambling being the downfall of Bermudians.
These important issues normally represent seismic shifts in our culture and way of life and, therefore, these are the issues that we need to take directly to our people to hear what they have to say.
This is yet another step towards “Open Government”, something that my Government believes in and has demonstrated.
Mr. Speaker, I am sure that I do not need to remind you that this has been the mantra of the PLP Government ever since we became the Government. I do not need to remind Honourable Members that it was this Government that introduced single seat constituencies almost immediately when we became the Government.
It was this Government that introduced town hall meetings as a medium to hear what people had to say about such contentious issues as the fate of the Long-term residents.
It was this Government that introduced the Ombudsman and the Public Access to Information legislation.
It was my Government that introduced the Open Budget process with the “Taking it to the people” budget meetings both in 2011 and 2012 and distributed pamphlets that have made it easy for persons to understand Ministry budgets and provide input into how their Government spends its money.
So Mr. Speaker, you can see that the parliamentary referendum is the next logical step.
However, Mr. Speaker, I must exhort all Bermudian voters that this will only work if they avail themselves of the referendum, when it is announced, to make their voices heard.
As Louis L’Amour once stated: “To make democracy work, we must be a nation of participants, not simply observers. One who does not vote has no right to complain.”
Mr. Speaker, a date for the first referendum to be held under the provisions of this Bill will be determined and announced in the near future.
Thank you Mr. Speaker.
-
Read More About
Comments (24)
Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Articles that link to this one:
- Pro-Gaming Organization Launches Website | Bernews.com | August 31, 2012
- UBP MP Charles Swan Suggests National Lottery | Bernews.com | November 6, 2012
- Timeline: Gambling, Casinos, Laws, Allegations | Bernews.com | February 19, 2014
Referendums? Really? Referenda please.
Have the reffy on gaming AND capital punishment!
“A date for the first referendum will be determined and announced in the near future” I wonder what the second one will be?
Finally!!! The people get a say!
The only sad part is that I wish we were not dealing with Gambling as a necessary means of getting us out of financial trouble.
My answer is …NO !
If the vote is ‘yes’ to gambling, you will see further unraveling of the fabric of our society, unless there are strict controls like: only tourists can gamble – but I doubt it.
What everyone really needs to be concerned about is what appears to be the very slack level of participation needed and a simple ‘majority’ .
Under what seems to have been announced here if only 51% of the electorate decided to participate in a referendum and 50% of them voted yes then technically 25% of the population will have their way !
If that isn’t scarey enough then ‘think independance’ !
You are correct that 25% will get their way, but it is still democratic. If the other 49% don’t vote it’s on them, but they do have the right to vote.
Why a referendum? The government was elected…stop abdicating your authority and do what governments are supposed to do – make decisions. This government is a spineless joke.
The government wants your opinion, but you prefer them to just make one on your behalf?
Bet you will be the first one criticizing the decision.
Of course I would criticize their decision if I didnt agree with it – what a ridiculous statement! That’s what happens when you are in politics. By virtue of my vote, I permit them to act on my behalf – why do you vote?
The government dont want our opinion – they want a get out of jail referendum so they can dodge accountability once again.
I wouldn’t get to excited because if it turns out all in favor well see how long it sits on the shelf. Remember its election time your gonna see and hear many things coming from this government.
Wow, scary stuff. Hate to think this thing passed quickly and half thought out on the coat-tail of Gambling, because it is seen as the new way to get us out of this ridiculous debt we have incurred.
The percentages first of all are completely mind boggling when you consider what may be on the line. Are we seriously considering using this frame work for such issues as Gambling and Independence? Really, how dumb are our opposition? Can they not see past the one point of speeding up the Referendum process which is the only part that makes any sense.
We are promised as Premier Cox says “Government is committed to fairness, TRANSPARENCY and propriety in the conduct of referendums” are you kidding me, is this the word of the week “transparency”. Please remove this word from all your speeches until you look it up in a dictionary for its true meaning. Since this word was introduced, we have seen NONE of it from this Government.
Later it states Ms Cox indicated that the rules can be customized for individual referendums, “including even with the percentage of the participation”. So at this point let’s just race this thing through and we’ll fine tune it to our liking as we start to use it.
I am totally lost for words on how this was passed with little fuss from the opposition. I believe the PLP is right about the OBA having NO direction.
+ 1
Can you just imagine 25% of the electorate taking us to independance ?
OBA , ANYONE , please look into this and speak up .
Everyone knows the PLP would love to sneak independance in through the back door any way they can and then proclaim to all that it was done through the democratic process of a referendum !
Sneak through the back door. If the 25% were to get their way into independence because the other 49% decided not to vote, then whose fault is it? If this is such a big deal to you then you need to make sure everyone votes.
All I’m doing is pointing out the obvious … at least to some people , that the whole thing has to be very clearly thought out.
Yes it is up to everyone interested to show up and vote , but on an issue such as independance the minimum requirements should be at least 70% of voter participation with a min of 70% in favour.
For gambling , probably not such a large number in favour is needed as it’s not as serious as independance.
Hmmm…gambling coming into law before we’re even allowed to buy alcohol on Sundays?
When the large hotels get their casinos, hopefully the profits will help reduce their room rates… opening up our market to the less wealthy. Those could be good consequences.
Bermuda be wise and take note:
Citizens of Monaco are not allowed to gamble and not even allowed
to visit casinos there
NOTHING goes down in Bermuda …ever !
It will just be marketed as a false new ‘premium destination’ with the same old lack of value for money.
I’m not against gambling per se , but it’s not going to make us more desireable in the long run or fix our tourism problems.
Just ask the people who used to be our repeat visitors throughout the 60′s and late 70′s. Gambling won’t even be mentioned .
No thank you.
I don’t disagree with gambling in a moral sense, but this would only have negative effects on Bermuda. The revenue would not be enough to be cost-effective, and Bermuda’s image will be at stake. Tourism destinations are all about theme these days, and there are plenty of place that are marketed completely around gambling. All or nothing, in other words. It’s not worth it in our particular case.