Column: Ben Smith On Hotel SDO & More

April 24, 2023

[Opinion column written by OBA Senate Leader Ben Smith]

When my family moved to Southampton five decades ago, we had a clear view of the then-Southampton Princess being built. I was a baby then so of course I don’t remember first-hand, but what I do fondly remember is the hotel becoming an important part of my upbringing.

With my father, Hubert Smith Sr, being one of Bermuda’s most loved entertainers, and the then-Southampton Princess not only being in my backyard, but the place to go when you wanted to see the latest acts, I have a lifelong connection to this hotel.

And I know that I am not alone.

Many major events and milestones have been celebrated at the hotel. For me it was where my father worked, where I started playing golf, attended proms and many prizegivings.

When I got married, my wife and I were gifted a suite by a former general manager of the iconic hotel. The memories are endless.

Why am I sharing this?

Because the hotel is more than ‘just a building’ to me. It’s iconic not just in the Southampton community, but to the island as a whole.

I want to be clear that I want the Fairmont Southampton to be reopened and support the hotel project however I must point out what I have observed to date.

When COVID-19 ravaged the world, and many businesses closed or suffered in major way, we had to accept the changes caused by challenging times. The major blow was the closure of the Fairmont Southampton and the loss of so many jobs in our community.

I couldn’t understand how our major hotel with the iconic brand could fall when so many others were figuring out how to survive.

Then Gencom couldn’t pay its employees redundancy. This seemed strange considering it is a large, successful company. What happened after that, though, is what has given me concern.

  • The government pays the employees so that they are not suffering
  • The union negotiates a new agreement
  • Gencom comes up with the funds to pay back the government

The majority of Bermuda wants the hotel to be reopened because it creates jobs. Closing it contributed to an economic problem that it’s imperative we find a solution for.

Most people would agree that the construction project is important to help our stagnant economy. The issue with this is the developers have already said a high percentage of the construction work will be done by foreign workers. Some will benefit from this project but not as many Bermudians as people have been led to believe.

Many hotels in Bermuda complete refurbishments while remaining open. The Fairmont Southampton was operating and making money before it closed, so why cut off its lifeblood?

Fairmont Southampton is a conference and group booking hotel that accommodated a large number of our air arrivals. Without these consistent air arrivals, the airlines have started to look elsewhere for their revenue and now our airlift has been put into jeopardy. We have had reduced flights or lost routes because of these changes. The pandemic can’t take all the blame when our competitors are continuing to increase routes and airlift.

The Government and Gencom will tell Bermuda that they will have a high percentage of Bermudians working in the hotel and there will be so many increases in opportunities. We cannot forget that those job losses were caused by the initial closure so we can’t now give credit for solving that problem.

I have only been speaking about the hotel project because that is the portion that is important to the Bermuda community. We are all waiting for hotel renovations to begin because we have heard an early 2024 reopening is the plan after all the delays. It is difficult to believe that a $450 million dollar upgrade will be completed in such a short amount of time, but I’m not a construction expert. I hope that this won’t be just a new coat of paint and cosmetic changes for our iconic hotel?

Just because we’re eager for construction jobs, hotel jobs and potential increased airlift doesn’t mean we should make decisions based on desperation. The development project in the SDO is not about tourism so we cannot allow that to be the narrative.

We are desperate to have the hotel reopened and approved concessions and incentives to make sure it happens. The Opposition has and continues to support the project for refurbishment and reopening of the hotel but I don’t think our community should have to swallow even more because of the leverage that was created when we were at our lowest.

The original SDO was large scale with130 units and there is no need to make it bigger by adding a further 131 units, and it’s detrimental to Bermuda for it to be accepted under duress.

Let’s be clear: the majority of the condos are not about tourism and the units for tourism can opt out, so why are one of the largest contributors to the tourism economy being held hostage because of the condo scheme?

- Ben Smith

Read More About

Category: All, Business, News, Politics

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Ringmaster says:

    The hotel refurbishment should be separate from any condo/house development. Why should Bermuda homeowners, or prospective homeowners pay for Gencom to build such units tax and duty free for 20 years?

    Is the hotel still viable from a structural point of view? It’s already over 40 years old. Can a proper refurbishment be done for the estimated costs, to last at least another 20 years? Or will it be a lick of paint to last 5 years then demolition and more real estate paid for by taxpayers? Where are the details of what Burt has signed Bermuda taxpayers to for the next 20 years? It can’t be good when he is missing in action and has to send in lightweights like Crystal Caesar to support this disaster?

  2. Agreed says:

    Here here!!!!

    Now what are the options?