BUEI Set To Host Annual Youth Climate Summit
The Bermuda Underwater Exploration Institute [BUEI] will be hosting its Annual Youth Climate Summit, featuring renowned experts and young climate activists addressing global and local climate issues.
A spokesperson said, “The Bermuda Underwater Exploration Institute’s [BUEI] highly anticipated Annual Youth Climate Summit is back, featuring a dynamic lineup of distinguished subject matter experts and young climate activists who are driving change globally and locally.
Key Presenters
“This year’s summit showcases an impressive roster of presenters, both virtually and in person:
- Dr J. Marshall Shepard: Professor of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Georgia and host of The Weather Channel’s Award-Winning Sunday talk show Weather Geeks [Virtual Session]
- Jessica A. Knoblauch: Award-winning Senior Staff writer at Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental law organisation [Virtual Session]
- Bodhi Patil: Climate Solutionist, Ocean Activist, and Founder of Inner Light [Virtual Session and In-person]
- Dr Jeffrey Steynor: Ocean Energy expert, Principal Engineer BELCO’s Project Management Office [In-person]
“BUEI’s 2023 Youth Climate Summit brings together the best of both worlds – expert insights and the inspiring stories of youth activists making a real difference. Attendees can look forward to engaging with:
- Ela Gökçiğdem, Turkish/American Social Entrepreneur and Climate Activist - Sustainable Ocean Alliances Youth Policy Advisory Council [Virtual Session and In-person]
- Jevanic Henry, St Lucia – United Nations SG Youth Climate Advisor [Virtual Session and In-person]
- Mikaela Loach, UK Climate Justice Activist - Author of ‘Not That Radical: Climate Action To Transform Our World’, Medical Student and Podcast Co-Host [Virtual Session]
- Demetri Sedita, USA, Founder Green Gasparilla - An environmental protection initiative targeting plastic waste from Florida’s annual Gasparilla Flotilla parade [Virtual Session]
- Sharona Shnayder, Nigerian/Israel Environmental Activist - National Geographic Young Explorer, Founder of Tuesdays for Trash, SailGP Impact League Judge [Virtual Session]
Why It Matters
“The climate crisis is a global challenge that demands immediate and concerted action. The Annual Youth Climate Summit provides a platform where young leaders and experts can collaborate, share ideas, and accelerate progress toward a sustainable future.
How to Attend
“Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of the change. Register now at www.YCSBda.com to secure your spot at the Annual Youth Climate Summit.”
Read More About
Category: All, Environment
There is no climate crisis. The earth is not boiling. What we have are hysterical people and power-hungry people seeking to rule every aspect of our lives under the guise of saving the planet. Some quick facts:
1. There is no agreed-upon standard definition of “climate change” by major organizations such as the AMS, IPCC, NOAA, NASA, and the USGCRP. No agreement from these organizations on what percentage, if any, of alleged global warming is caused by humans (AGW). People with a Ph.D. and decades of subject matter expertise cannot agree on the meaning of simple words. Why? (Because it is Mother Nature doing her thing and governments cannot tax Mother Nature!)
“Climate change” is “meaning fluid,” that is, whatever you want it to mean at a given point in time to fit the narrative.
2. It is a known fact that sea level and temperature data are inaccurate. Inaccurate data produces inaccurate computer model results – fact.
NOAA’s 2017 5-year sea level prediction report was so bad that the 2022 5-year report LOWERED Florida’s sea level rise estimate by 35.3%. The reason for the difference, as stated by NOAA, is that the data is now “better.”
A NASA spokesperson stated in January 2015 that NASA was only 38% sure 2014 was the hottest year on record because NASA’s 3,000+ monitoring stations do not produce accurate data.
A March 2009 study titled “Is the US Surface Temperature Record Reliable?” found 89% of NOAA weather stations had heat-bias issues. 2022 follow-up study, the “Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official US Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed,” found approximately 96% of US temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what NOAA considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards.
If US data is so poor, how accurate is data from other countries?
3. It is a known fact that hundreds of “climate scientists” claimed to have won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize – when they did not! Al Gore and the IPCC as an organization were co-winners. Gore is not a scientist.
4. It is a known fact that tens of thousands of scientists failed to rat out their peers for claiming to have won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
5. Even the Obama White House twice claimed nominee for Member, the Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority, Dr. Marilyn A. Brown, was “a co-recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.” Somehow that claim got passed the fact-checkers in the White House, media, and Congress.
6. The media refuses to inform the public about the 2007 Nobel Prize claim issue because it would negatively impact the god-like stature of “climate scientists.”
7. The IPCC issued a memo in Dec 2012 telling scientists to stop claiming to be 2007 Nobel Prize winners but many still continue to this day making the claim. Many are advisors to governments.
8. The IPCC used scientists who claimed to be 2007 Nobel Peace Prizers winners in AR5 & AR6. AR5 came out in parts between September 2013 and October 2014. AR6 was released in parts in August 2021, February & April 2022, and March 2023.
9. IPCC reports do not follow any scientific methodology in their creation and are inadmissible in US Federal Courts as evidence.
10. Of the thousands of cherry-picked papers cited in IPCC reports, not one has ever been reproduced by the people working on the reports.
11. All five of Dr. Mann’s (the inventor of the debunked Hockey Stick graph) expert witnesses in the defamation case that he filed in US Federal Court were disallowed by the judge because reading and giving an opinion is not following a scientific method.
12. 97%+ “consensus” studies use bogus math claiming that a subset of a subset of a subset of the sample equals a consensus. Read a few and ask yourself how they were even published. The Doran and Zimmerman 2009 sample size was 10,257 scientists. The 97.4% consensus was determined using 75 out of 77 selected responses from scientists. 75/77 = 97.4% but in reality, 0.731% of the 10,257 sample.
13. Climate research papers dropped the Margin of Error which is too scary to mention and replaced it with the nebulous “Confidence Levels.”
14. Climate papers including those produced by the IPCC make up fear-mongering phrases that do not appear in major weather and meteorological dictionaries including the AMS, NASA, and NOAA.
15. Climate models are highly inaccurate. Using real-time data and supercomputers, NOAA cannot accurately predict the path of the largest single weather event on the planet over a region out past 5-6 days, and still gets it wrong (Dorian 2019). But we must not question the predictions of global warming and global sea level rise for 2050 & 2100 using flawed data, improperly placed & poorly maintained equipment, and inaccurate models.
Yada, yada, yada… People need to actually read what passes as “peer-reviewed” climate research and ask serious questions. Let your fingers do the walking on your keyboard across the Internet. I have yet to speak with anyone in Bermuda and elsewhere pushing “climate change” who can speak to the issue. Most certainly not anyone in the Bermuda Goverment.
READ for yourself. Think people! Question!