Column: Why Interfere With Corporations?
[Opinion column written by Shadow Minister for Home Affairs Sylvan Richards]
It’s Déjà Vu all over again – Yogi Berra. The more things change the more they stay the same.
What I am referring to is the recent announcement by Minister Walter Roban regarding the Government’s desire to take full control of the Municipalities of Hamilton and St George’s.
You may recall a few years ago that the previous PLP Administration made an unsuccessful attempt to take over the Corporations but when that failed, settled instead on strangling the Municipalities by removing their right to charge wharfage, replacing this lost income with a Government grant which was insufficient to meet their needs.
This had the presumably desired effect of ensuring that the Corporations had to come cap in hand to the Government in order to meet their obligations in terms of infrastructure. Nine years later the PLP is back for another bite at the cherry.
Not long after the OBA became Government, we returned the right to collect wharfage back to the Municipalities and the Government grant was removed, thereby giving the Corporations more financial independence. In St. George’s with the arrival of new cruise ships which the OBA secured during our tenure plus the introduction of a Heritage Tax, the Old Town has grown from strength to strength.
So, the question has to be asked: Why is the Government so keen on tearing apart two Corporations that have, all in all over their respective existences, done excellent work in promoting Bermuda and servicing their municipalities?
Why is there only a ten-day consultation period being given for the public to weigh in on the two options Government is considering imposing on the Municipalities, both of which will ultimately mean the end of the Corporations of Hamilton and St. George’s as entities run by the people for the people?
Minister Roban has essentially said that the Bermuda Government will be better at maintaining the infrastructure of the Municipalities and if the Government has control via a quango or by way of being subsumed into Government it can set the economic agenda for the Corporations.
However, the simple facts are these – both Corporations have traditionally done a better job than the Government at maintaining infrastructure, collecting garbage, promoting their respective municipalities, hosting events and serving their constituents. Simply put, can we really expect a Government that cuts trash pick-up to once a week to suddenly be able to collect garbage in the City of Hamilton every night?
Under the current Municipalities Act, the Government already has the final say on planning legislation so it can already plan for various economic zones, it can also give guidance for spending of the Heritage Tax in St. George’s, it can direct how any grants are spent and it can also take stewardship of the Corporations if Government directions are not followed.
In fact, most if not all of what the Government supposedly wishes to achieve with its proposed changes can already be done by way of utilising the existing legislation. So, again what is the deal? Why is the Government so desperate to interfere with two Corporations that work?
The answer is obvious. Control, pure and simple. This Government is totally obsessed with it.
Look at the moves Government has already made to gain control of the BTA and the Gaming Commission as examples. They can’t help themselves. No doubt subsuming the Corporations into Government will assist its balance sheet as a result of having more valuable real estate on its books – which given the huge hole in the current balance sheet will help.
Or, perhaps it is really about control of the Waterfront and the eventual awarding of contracts? Or perhaps the current Minister just does not like the personalities of some people at the two Corporations. Whatever the real reason for this travesty – it doesn’t pass the smell test.
Given that there is only a very short consultation period I think it’s safe to assume that the Government has already made up its mind about what it intends to do. I suspect there is a Bill already prepared in draft form that can be hastily tabled in parliament given that previously postponed elections need to be held in the next few months. There is more to this yarn than we are being told.
It is the Opposition’s view that a Local Government Act should be drafted which will modernise the relationship between the Government, Municipalities and the Parish Councils.
Such an Act would be reflective of the changing face of the City and the Town of St Georges and would set the foundation for truly collaborative opportunities. In the spirit of collaboration, the OBA would be willing to work alongside the PLP to make this a reality. Destroying hundreds of years of history simply to satisfy the ego of a chosen few would be a terrible mistake.
- Sylvan Richards
20 Most Recent Opinion Columns
- 12 Feb: Carla Seely Column: No Fixed Address?
- 09 Feb: Column: ‘Airport Objections Were Political’
- 07 Feb: Column: Working For A ‘Fairer, Better Bermuda’
- 25 Jan: Column: Parish Pride & Community Concerns
- 23 Jan: Column: Senator Jason Hayward On Education
- 18 Jan: Column: New Reality Of Economic Substance
- 17 Jan: Column: Theresa May’s ‘Plan B’ Brexit Options
- 17 Jan: Column: Honouring Connie & Helping Survivors
- 15 Jan: Column: Shared Goals That Benefit Our Children
- 10 Jan: Column: Spending $175,000 On An Empty Office
- 09 Jan: Carla Seely Column: Hoping For A Century?
- 04 Jan: Column: Looking Forward At Fintech In 2019
- 03 Jan: Column: Parish Pride Cleanup Project Continues
- 02 Jan: Column: Bermuda & Digital Assets A Busy 2018
- 20 Dec: Column: ‘Time To Come Clean’ On Arbitrade
- 19 Dec: Column: Teen Offers Global Warming Challenge
- 18 Dec: Column: Managing A Financial Windfall
- 14 Dec: Column: Community Clean Up Efforts Continue
- 12 Dec: Column: 100 Homes, Grand Atlantic, Housing
- 10 Dec: Column: Human Rights Anniversary Today
Opinion columns reflect the views of the writer, and not those of Bernews Ltd. To submit an Opinion Column/Letter to the Editor, please email info@bernews.com. Bernews welcomes submissions, and while there are no length restrictions, all columns must be signed by the writer’s real name.
-
Why destroy what is not broke? This Government has proven itself to be inept at everything it touches. It is unable to run a small bus service or small sanitation service. After decades of a dismally run Tourism Department we now have an independent BTA. Look at the results.
The corporations have a long history of being well run, except for the first take over of the COH, & sure do not need interference by Government now.
This says it all:
Why is the Government so desperate to interfere with two Corporations that work?
The answer is obvious. Control, pure and simple. This Government is totally obsessed with it.
PLP just trying to get their paws on all the real estate and tax revenues so it can run them like Bermuda Government where buses, trash collections, road paving, hedge trimming, Child & Family Services, Financial Assistance, Budget, Debt, etc. etc. are a COMPLETE AND UTTER SHAMBLES!!
What’s the voters thoughts??
when is Bermuda going to realise it’s been smashed by the plp.
I think this is just out and out control. You must be able to run a country before you start micromanaging entities within the country.Of course it’s all about another revenue stream. All of the financial criticisms that were leveled at the OBA for their mismanagement of funds which was a true picture of where the country stood/stands economically after 14!years. I do think there is stagnation within the Corporations and a need to be a lot more innovative. They don’t seem to be able to generate ideas for making the Corporations more appealing. Let’s start with Reid Street.
“Nine years later the PLP is back for another bite at the cherry.”
Exactly.