Burch: Crackdown On Derelict Properties

February 17, 2011

david burch oct 25 2010Government intends to fast-track the legal process required to confiscate and demolish vacant or derelict properties being used for “criminal or anti-social behaviour”, National Security Minister David Burch told the Senate yesterday [Feb. 16].

Sen. Burch said some Bermuda communities comprised of otherwise law-abiding citizens had become centres for illegal activity because abandoned properties had attracted anti-social elements who used them as crime dens.

He said the exisiting ”burdensome and deliberately lengthy process” required for demolishing  these derelict and abandoned buildings presented an ongoing and serious obstacle to neighborhood restoration.

“I am pleased to announce that after an initial discussion in Cabinet, I intend to spearhead a revamp of the law in this area to make  it easier to demolish vacant and derelict properties where they are the site of illegal and anti-social behaviour,” said Sen. Burch. “In outline, Madame President, the legislation will permit the Minister of National Security to cause an application to be made to the Supreme Court for an order that the vacant or derelict premises be demolished. Before seeking such an order, several avenues must be exhausted. These include establishing ownership and that the sole activity at the site if illegal and/or anti-social behaviour.

“Madame President, we must address these issues speedily, meeting the needs of law-abiding citizens while not adversely affecting the property rights of others.”

The full text of the National Security Minister’s statement appears below:

Madame President, this Government has committed to preserving and in some cases restoring safety to our communities. Often times this aim is frustrated by a structure that lends itself to criminal and anti-social activity.

Madame President, too many neighbourhoods, comprised of honest, law-abiding citizens, are made to suffer because a vacant or derelict property has been converted for use by an anti-social element of society. In many cases owners of such properties are resident overseas or are elderly and cannot maintain them as required. It is also a fact that multiple owners and protracted family disputes can lead to properties deteriorating in this way.

Madame President, the people in these neighbourhoods deserve some relief and our claim to be a Government of law and good order must extend to them as well.

Like many things in government, the mechanism by which action can be taken with a vacant and derelict property is currently a burdensome and deliberately lengthy process. Too lengthy in my view and I am pleased to say, in the view of my Cabinet colleagues.

Madame President, when confronted with a process that could, potentially, take years, it became readily apparent that we not help restore neighbourhood safety without a wholesale revision of the law in this area.

To give you an idea of the process I attach a flow chart of the steps currently required to demolish a vacant and derelict building. You will well know, Madame President, that this flow chart alone would be sufficient to make me do something else.

As such, Madame President, I am pleased to announce that after an initial discussion in Cabinet, I intend to spearhead a revamp of the law in this area to make  it easuer to demolish vacant and derelict properties where they are the site of illegal and anti-social behaviour.

In outline, Madame President, the legislation will permit the Minister of National Security to cause an application to be made to the Supreme Court for an order that the vacant or derelict premises be demolished. Before seeking such an order, several avenues must be exhausted. These include establishing ownership and that the sole activity at the site if illegal and/or anti-social behaviour.

Madame President, we must address these issues speedily, meeting the needs of law-abiding citizens while not adversely affecting the property rights of others.

My aim is to have these provisions considered by the Legislature following this Second Term which is traditionally devoted to Budget matters.

Madame President, this Government’s commitment to safer communities is real and this plan for action addresses some longstanding concerns in several neighbourhoods. We will continue to work every day on innovative solutions to improve the lives of all people in Bermuda.

Thank you, Madame President.

Read More About

Category: All, Crime, News, Politics

Comments (12)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Au Contraire says:

    Would the Col. be talking about Teucer house on Cedar Ave. or the abandoned properties at the US Naval Annex in Southampton?

    Island Construction needs more demolition work do they?

    • RobbieM says:

      …or those former British naval buidings up at Dockyard that were allowed to fall into disrepair? I think if you do a survey of derelict buildings in Bermuda, a vast majority of them belong to the Bermuda Government!

  2. Truth is killin' me says:

    Madame President…let’s start with the House of Assembly!!!

  3. Bottom Line says:

    Col. Burch…I have disagreed with you on many points. But on this I stand shoulder-to-shoulder. Press on with this….you might even get my Vote!!

  4. Sarah says:

    Interesting initiative.
    Will this include homes that are derelict, have homeless people living in them, but are not involved in drugs etc?
    Will the owners be indemnified for the house being torn down, and will they continue to own the property after the house is demolished?

  5. S says:

    Homeless people living in derelict homes ??? dont think they are homeless…. And how many homeless people do you know that arent on drugs or alcohol ?? Lets be real stop with the childs play

  6. SaveMeFromThisBS says:

    Oh we’re back on this again…..

    Col. Burch needs to put a show on CITV… Extreme Home Takeover!

    Fronting a house….take it over
    Spouse isnt licenced (spaded or neutered)…take it over
    Haven’t fixed it up in 10 years…take it over
    Homeless and looking for an empty roof (since they haven’t done shit for Salvation Army)….take it over

    P.L.P. we running this house sh*t!

  7. Ya'll are just not smart enough says:

    Lets hope Government tackles its own derelict buildings first before placing its large hands on the publics because there are numerous government owned buildings that are being used to house drug users and suppliers. Do not throw stones if you live in a glass house.

  8. TRAP BOYZ says:

    THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO DEAL WITH THE REAL ISSUES N STOP TRYNA STEAL FROM THE POOR. WE HAVE CRIME ON THE RISE BUT YET U WANT TO KNOCK DOWN HOUSES????? GET A GRIP ON THE REAL ISSUES!!! I AM PISSED OFF N HAD ENOUGH

  9. Lets see says:

    If I remember correctly this was put forward before. Not that I disagree but election time is coming up soon and you are starting to see them unveil all these plans. The problem is the don’t carry them through after the election.

  10. Sharon says:

    What about the horrific eyesore that used to be Clay House Inn? Government should make the owners knock it down – if they wont – knock it down for them and then make them pay for it – why should the tax payers be putting up all the money for these buildings to be knocked down? The owners of the property need to be held accountable – if they can’t afford to do it – sell the property and let the next property owners do it! Also – Government should give these “knock down” jobs to the small construction companies – the other 2 big ones have enough government money to keep them going.