Column: The Switzerland Of The Atlantic

March 28, 2022

Ryan Robinson Perinchief Bermuda March 27 2022[Opinion column written by Ryan Robinson Perinchief - “The Switzerland Of The Atlantic, revisiting Jack Tucker’s vision”]

In the early 1900’s, Sir Henry “Jack” Tucker, founding member of the Forty Thieves club comprising of powerful white merchants and Bermuda’s ruling elite, set out on a mission to transform Bermuda into the “Switzerland of the Atlantic”.

In other words, these architects of modern-day Bermuda toured the world to attract international business, with the goal of positioning Bermuda as a small but wealthy highly developed financial hub to serve as an island oasis for the global elite.

Working in tandem with the Bank of Butterfield and law firms such as Appleby Spurling & Kempe and Conyers Dill & Pearman in the 1930’s, Tucker helped lay the foundation to entice international business, and enacted various reforms alongside local oligarchs to promote the establishment of trusts and offshore companies for wealthy overseas clients to fulfil this goal [Bermuda Biographies]. Given our geographic and resource constraints, this was not by any means an irrational objective.

However, the key omission in this strategy was the thinking of Bermuda’s ruling elites, that they could cherry-pick purely the economic aspects of the Swiss model whilst overlooking the other elements which maintain the delicate balance upon which its success lies.

Like Switzerland, Bermuda has earned its place as a small, geographically challenged but highly affluent service-oriented economy with a high standard of living and one of the highest GDPs per capita. Yes, like Switzerland, Bermuda has managed to develop a large financial services sector, making it a hub of reinsurance, banking and international business, coupled with an influx of skilled workers and wealthy individuals and residents from all over the world.

But unlike Bermuda, Switzerland learned that the concentration of extreme wealth in such a small territory comes with a price. While Switzerland ranks second only to Bermuda in terms of the world’s most expensive places to live, unlike Bermuda, Switzerland has been progressive enough to mitigate the disastrous risks of high wealth inequality, hoarded and non-productive wealth, poor investment of accumulated wealth, and the impact of disparities among the populace of the small area in which such wealth is concentrated.

In the land of the super-rich, Switzerland’s political structure, tax system, and welfare state are all measures which serve to mitigate the social costs of its economic prosperity – and promote social equality and the redistribution of wealth into the hands of the local populace.

These measures which underpin the success of the Swiss system include:

  • Deliberative Democracy: Switzerland is a semi-direct democratic federal republic where a decentralised government is controlled by the people, and decisions at the top made through consensus, with up to five referendums on various issues a year;
  • Fair Taxation: a progressive, albeit decentralised, taxation system which ensures that the rate at which an individual’s income is taxed increases as more income is earned, incorporates corporate and wealth taxes, and ensures that revenue from these taxes is sufficiently allocated toward social programs;
  • Strong Social Protection: including universal health care, an elaborate old-age pension system, a series of other social benefits for families and the most vulnerable, safety nets for the unemployed and disenfranchised;
  • World Class Public Education: based on a system of community-led, decentralised schooling; inclusive of a high degree of flexibility and specialised apprenticeships and multiple Swiss-university tracks;
  • Self-Sufficiency and Autonomous Development: Switzerland produces more than half of its own food and has made a conscious decision to reduce its reliance on foreign imports for its food and energy needs, spending a significant amount on local research and development to increase self-sufficiency.

All these measures underpin the Swiss system and serve to counterbalance the social costs of its financial success.

Whilst one could hope the nation’s elites would recognise that the window of financial services was limited and ensure the benefits of economic success served to incentivise good investment of wealth into education and diversification, failing this, Switzerland had the right political system to ensure accountability and allow the moment of opportunity to be seized effectively. Having used the wealth of the financial services boom wisely, Switzerland has now emerged as a place where its status as a world financial hub is less important – moving beyond financial services into new areas of opportunity such as SMEs [small and medium enterprises] and start-ups, research, and high-quality exports as a high-tech, industrialised, diversified economy in a small geographic area. The era of stereotypical Swiss banking and wealth was an important phase which allowed it to develop. But it was a means of further advancement, not an end in itself.

To put it in a few words, the Swiss mechanisms of political accountability, with its federalist structure and deliberative democracy, comprised the necessary criteria such that wealth which came in through its financial services industry could be channelled, through political instruments, to allow for a system whereby new wealth was redistributed into 1] investments in research and local upskilling & education, 2] creation of the social welfare system, and 3] diversification into new areas of industry that allowed for more sustainable development.

Crucially, while Bermuda remains a British colony with no right to determine its own international agreements or foreign affairs – remaining at the mercy of international regulatory and political bodies such as the EU, the OECD, the FCDO and Britain’s own relationship with the rest of Europe, historically “Switzerland has played expertly its hand in negotiations with the EU, resulting in arrangements that mix sovereign independence with market access in a way many British politicians would love to emulate” [Financial Times].

Their approach is essentially, “high quality, high cost, high social and political protection and fiscal sovereignty”. It is these latter elements which we have failed to implement to date.

Ultimately, the architects of Switzerland understood that their system is a delicate one, whereby economic wealth must be counterbalanced with strong social and political protections, not to mention its carefully managed relationship with the global financial order from a position of equality and mutual respect – in which self-determination is a fundamental component.

The failure of Bermuda’s architects to understand this holistic approach to economic development is what marks the key difference between a relationship of exploitation between the population of a small state with the global financial order, rather than a symbiotic one.

Nearly a hundred years after the “Jack Tucker model”, our country is in a state of economic flux: navigating a landmark period of global tax reform, the OECD breathing down our necks, the Attorney General’s recognition of our constitutional limitations, and key economists warning of a population deficit crisis, Bermuda must decide where it wants to sit in the new international order.

Once upon a time, the oligarchs saw the Swiss framework as a method of sustenance for themselves, but nearly a hundred years later it is clear that it was not embraced in full. The template was never completed – only the elements which favoured the oligarchy. A process which was started by Jack Tucker which allowed for Bermuda’s prosperity as a derivative of the oligarchy, must be re-examined holistically to include the social, environmental and political programs which make the Swiss model sustainable.

Ultimately, it was Jack Tucker and the ruling elite who first championed the concept of Switzerland as a model to emulate. So where did this process get derailed? It stopped at the point where the oligarchy made their profit. The process was never continued so that the general populace would benefit from the largesse of this economic windfall in other areas of national development. Restarting this process means that if Bermuda is to fulfil the vision of the architects of Bermuda’s economic success as proposed by Henry “Jack” Tucker, then the social, political and economic development of Switzerland should be embraced in its entirety, including those aspects which emphasise ‘building-up’ rather than ‘trickle-down’.

Whether Bermuda truly wants to become the “Switzerland of the Atlantic” or not is up to us. But one thing is clear: come success or failure, the Swiss model is ultimately one for and by the Swiss. The priority of a community-directed, sovereign Switzerland which puts the needs of its citizens first is a key ingredient in its formula for success. To take a page from Walter Rodney, “the products of their labour were rationally utilized to bring greater independence and well-being to the nation”. Can Bermuda say the same?

Now is a crucial time for international businesses and local decisionmakers to come together and identify a coordinated strategy which will position us for continued prosperity in all areas. The status quo has stemmed from attempting to co-opt an economic model without the social and political components which underpin its continued success. If we are to embrace the Swiss model, we should embrace it fully.

- Ryan Robinson Perinchief is a Visiting Scholar at the Blavatnik School of Government, focusing on economic recovery. A Bermuda Rhodes Scholar, he graduated with a Master’s in Public Policy from the University of Oxford and obtained his Bachelor of Laws at Durham University in the UK. Ryan graduated from the Berkeley Institute after attending Bermuda Institute, and is also the Founder and Director of Future Leaders Bermuda. Views expressed are in his personal capacity.

Read More About

Category: All, News

Comments (15)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Julian Griffiths says:

    Switzerland imports goods and labor at far lower cost than Bermuda can They come across the borders every day. The federal income tax rate for the highest earners is 11.5% which is less than Bermuda’s payroll tax rate.

    Federal corporation tax is very low but this tax is usually negotiated at the canton level. Given Bermuda’s competitors, commitments to international companies and location, I don’t know how Bermuda could compete with any meaningful corporation tax unless our competitor locations were forced to do the same.

  2. Joe Bloggs says:

    Phrases such as “founding member of the Forty Thieves club comprising of powerful white merchants and Bermuda’s ruling elite” and “local oligarchs” show your bias.

    But fear not, the PLP Government is doing its best to strip with wealth from all of us.

    • trufth says:

      I quit reading after the “founding member of the Forty Thieves” comment which makes him ineffective as a writer.

      To be an effective writer, or speaker for that matter, you can’t risk taking a dump on your readers or listeners in your first sentence. You want people to read your whole article right??

      Writing 101.

  3. Triangle Drifter says:

    “founding member of the Forty Thieves club comprising of powerful white merchants and Bermuda’s ruling elite”

    Lost interest & stopped reading right there.

    • Toodle-oo says:

      LOL , and coming from a person born 40 years after they no longer existed.
      This is one of the HUGE stumbling blocks we have here when it comes to social and political advancement , and there’s thousands of examples.
      Children are getting their heads filled with re-written history crap from people with no true recollection of their own and passing it on as facts.
      There is actually young people out there who truly believe that the ’40 Thieves’ rode around on horses at night raiding Black people’s houses !

  4. puzzled says:

    Imports everything.
    Switzerland is land locked.
    We are 600 miles at sea.

  5. Andrew W Outerbridge says:

    Pretty biased and might I add ill-informed analysis.

    • saud says:

      Do you expect anything informed, non racist, or non homophobic from them?

      I don’t.

  6. Bill says:

    Im am totally confused with this article. Is it a pro independance article? Or is it we are looking at different ways to tax people more article? Or is it we need help serious help from other people article?

    • Joe Bloggs says:

      The article is a PLP puff piece, so it is both advocating independence and punitive taxation of a certain segment of society (powerful white merchants).

      And for those who would say that this article says nothing about independence, it was published the first business day after 18 of the PLP’s 30 MPs voted in favour of opening cannabis shops in Bermuda (, an Act of Parliament the PLP Government knows full well will cause conflict with London and will be used as a pre-text for independence. But make no mistake, David Burt learned from Sir John Swan. There will be no referendum this time.

  7. khalid A Wasi says:

    The concepts advanced can be appreciated. I for many years talked about other more democratic forms of Government that were more participatory. That has never certainly not in the last 50 years been on anyone’s agenda more particularly of late. You peeked my curiosity when you said Jack Tucker created the 40 thieves. That was a borrowed term and now need to know when it was first adopted. Because if the idea was that he headed up the oligarchy Bermuda had an oligarchy long before Jack was born. He worked for the Bank of Bermuda which when it started did so because the BNTB was considered the elites bank, things obviously changed but I need to know about that term. The 40 thieves Club on front street started I believe 1962 or thereabouts and don’t know if he was an investor there.

    • Joe says:

      I do agree that Sir Henry did not create the Forty Thieves Club. As a banker he had clout, but the ‘thieves’ were the long standing Bermudian Front Street merchants, well known. I think the reference stems from its manifestation on the walls of new 40 Thieves Club, and hence joined the local vernacular. Dating from early sixties. Real wealth and opportunity did not appear until the 1950s in my view.

      As for the article, I think it stands as very valid despite comments. Interestingly, it doves nicely with Dickinson’s piece and his call for broader input towards solving Bermuda’s current challenges.

    • Toodle-oo says:

      Terry Brannon once said that the club name was tongue in cheek as either a fun poke at them or due to some of their patronage.

      • Joe Bloggs says:

        I am with Tarry on that one. The “home” of the Forty Thieves was the RBYC.

  8. Helvetia says:

    If we had not been governed by crooks, degenerates and morons for the last 24 years, this article would be wholly redundant. These are the folks responsible for the fact the country is broke and people are suffering as a result. It never ceases to amaze me how well educated academics, who got their academic receipts literally with a silver spoon afforded them every step of the way, so easily fall into this flavour of the moment rhetoric. This is of course intellectual laziness that results ultimately in cliched pseudo intellectual dribble. Of course, when I’m doubt, blame the rain makers, great national treasures like Sir. Henry.