Mayor: ‘Not Going To Take This Lying Down’

July 6, 2020 | 9 Comments

“We are not going to take this lying down,” Hamilton Mayor Charles Gosling said, adding that “we don’t believe this action by the Government is lawful and we are prepared to resolve the issue in the courts.”

Minister Burch’s Comments

In the House on Friday, Minister of Public Works Lt/Col David Burch mentioned the municipality reform legislation that was tabled in this House last year and said, “It is no secret that it was the then Ministers intention, who had responsibility for Municipalities, to bring this legislation back to the House after the summer break – he was carrying out a government initiative and I can see no reason why I would change course now that I have assumed this responsibility.

“On an island as small as ours, I simply cannot understand why there are three separate ‘governments’. In the case of the Corporation of Hamilton we have to consider economies of scale – more so in this post Covid environment.

“You have the Government on the one hand collecting garbage, providing engineering services, managing waste and sewerage, while the Corporation of Hamilton provides the exact same services, only delineated by the invisible line in the sand.

“This is but one example of duplication of effort and we must have the serious conversation as the island is only 21 miles long – and in most jurisdictions, the municipality has a larger footprint.

“I will close with this. Not everyone likes change. Not everyone understands change….or why it is necessary. But what I will say is this – this Administration will effect change by doing what we believe is best for the people of this country…..despite the back seat drivers telling us where they think we should go,” Minister Burch said.

Corporation’s Comments

A Corporation spokesperson said, “The City of Hamilton is preparing to take on the renewed threat of a Government takeover after Minister Colonel David Burch’s ministerial statement to the House on Friday announced the continuation of those efforts.

“A public consultation poll commissioned by the Government in 2019 resulted in an overwhelming 98% of respondents calling for no interference from Government in the management of Hamilton and St. George’s.

“While the legislation was passed in the House, the Senate voted the Bill down due to the poll results and also expressed their desire that St. George’s deserved their own legislation due to their vastly different organizational and tax/budget structures.”

City of Hamilton Mayor, Charles Gosling said, “It is the Minister’s assertion that he wants to work collaboratively for the benefit of the Bermudian people. We’re willing to accept the Minister at his word to engage in true dialogue, putting aside all previous attempts at asset grabbing, as shown by prior Ministers whose attempts at collaboration were no more than 15-minute, tick-the-box conversations.

“We don’t yet know what the coming Bill will include, if it’s back to a quango option, as outlined in the 2019 failed Bill, but if so, that is not collaboration, that is a take-over, and in my opinion, they have no legal right.

“The elected members of the Corporation have a duty of care to the City rate-payers and residents. We stand accountable to them. Local Government is important in any municipality. It impacts our stakeholders more positively, delivers response and results more promptly than any national Government, and our rate-payers and residents can have far more influence at the local level. Interference by Government and the appointing of City officials will only serve to disinfranchise our rate-payers and residents which is completely undemocratic. It is taxation without representation.”

“A prime example of the importance of local Government is what happened at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. Government sanitation crews, exercising their right, stayed off the job due to very legitimate health concerns concerning their fellow workers. It was the Corporation crews that answered the call from Government to assist with island-wide refuse collection. Had that not been an option, this island would have seen an even greater added health risk with mountains of rotting trash across Bermuda.

“The Government already has ministerial oversight of the Corporation of Hamilton as all of our resolutions must receive final approval from the minister. We also must abide by Financial Instructions as set out by the Government. No significant leases or purchase of Corporation property can be transacted without the approval of Parliament. It is our mandate to govern with fiscal prudence and the City prides itself on having transparent processes.”

“We are not going to take this lying down. This is a significant challenge. We don’t believe this action by the Government is lawful and we are prepared to resolve the issue in the courts. The original Act of Incorporation in 1793 vested the powers of the then town to the Mayor and his elected members, assigning them ‘forever’ to their successors.

“The Government of the day has done an exemplary job responding to the COVID-19 crisis and to have them revisit this municipal action, as the island struggles to recover, is indeed disappointing and an irresponsible use of resources. This is the time for us to come together and put all of our energies toward ensuring that Bermuda thrives.

“This will be my third go-around with this issue. We saved the City once before in 2010, we faced the threat in 2019 and we’re now preparing to face it again. The Corporation has served Hamilton, its rate-payers and residents, our visitors and indeed the greater Bermuda community for 225 years. 2020 is a celebratory year for us.

“No one at the Corporation has it in their schedule that it will be the last. We intend to live up to our vision of being a democratically elected, vibrant, safe and clean City focused on economic growth and livability.”

Read More About

Category: All, News, Politics

Comments (9)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Leave us alone says:

    Why did the government not consult the people of the City of Hamilton before moving ahead with a senseless acquisition? The Senate clearly saw the stupidity of this futile attempt to take control of a successful entity. The last thing I want or need is a bunch of children running the City.

  2. Guy Carri says:

    The money grab continues. The gov should let the CoH run W&E. They are FAR more effective.
    Good luck to the city when gov gets ahold of it. It will never be managed as good as it is now. Down the hill it goes.

  3. sandgrownan says:

    Duplication of effort? Are you kidding me? No collection of trash in Smiths last week, and it’s piling up. How about David Burch gets his own house in order before going on an asset grab.

    Because that’s all this is – an asset and revenue grab because the PLP have 20 years of abject failure on their record.

    A better idea, would be for the Corp of Hamilton to take over Govt. services since they are historically better at it!

  4. Ellen says:

    Personally, I think that Corp of Hamilton should be remain independent of BDA Government given the fact that the Bermuda Government is known for “bleeding monies” out of its coffers. If Corp of Hamilton was taken over by Government the monies would be spent elsewhere and not on the infrastructure of Hamilton itself.

    • John says:

      have we forgotten the missing 18 million dollars out of the corporations pockets.The way I see it, it dont matter what government has control, the outcomes are the same.

      • Joe Bloggs says:

        What missing $18 million?

        The Court of Appeal overturned the original judgment, the Corporation of Hamilton is NOT responsible for the failed Par-la-Ville Car Park development.

  5. Unbelievable says:

    Why is this still an on-going issue? Didn’t Govt take control of the Corporation’s already?

  6. Phil says:

    Surely the “back seat drivers” Burch is complaining about are “people of this country” too?

  7. Hope Berg says:

    Right on Mr. Mayor.

Leave a Reply