Tucker’s Director: “Bermuda Needs This SDO”

March 16, 2011

Rosewood Tucker's Point Hotel Bermuda Feb 4th 2011-1-10[Written by Bermudian Paul Telford, the Rooms and Spa Director at Tucker’s Point Hotel & Spa]

Hopefully amidst the barrage of rhetoric and sensationalism what I have written here will help to shed a refreshing perspective on some of the factors surrounding the Tucker’s Point SDO. From what I understand, an SDO should only be granted where national interests require it. Bermuda needs this SDO now more than ever. I cannot express to you the fear that stabs at my heart when I think of what could become of our tourism industry should this SDO not be approved.

I’m not an economist. I’m a career hotelier. However, it doesn’t take much to understand that our island’s economy is entirely dependent on foreign investment. We have zero natural resources to sell to the rest of the world. All we have to offer is our services. Tourism, banking and reinsurance services are a few that we have done well in the past. The external investment comes in to Bermuda and provides the fuel that powers our island economy, providing jobs for many Bermudians and even some people who are not Bermudian.

So why is it imperative that Bermuda see this SDO approved? Because Bermuda as a nation depends on external investment, and in such dire global economic times, we cannot afford to scare away potential investment in this way. There are countless investors around the globe who are watching us this very moment. If these investors see that Bermuda’s decision makers welcome foreign investment and provide the support necessary for success, they will inject the finances necessary to sustain our way of life. If these same investors see hesitation on our part, they will more than likely take their money elsewhere. This is not a decision that we can put off for a year and deal with later. We need to show confidence and decidedness.

Understand that this is not a Tucker’s Point problem. This is a Bermudian problem that includes Tucker’s Point, Newstead Belmont Hills, Pink Beach and all potential future developments. If the SDO is approved, Bermuda could very well experience a strong surge of investors who would be willing to save projects such as Newstead and Pink Beach. Projects in the pipeline could also see a surge in activity.

Many commentators in opposition to the SDO question why we should save Tucker’s Point, HSBC, or Mr. Trippe. A few have commented that Tucker’s Point should be allowed to go into receivership. This SDO is clearly about saving Bermudian jobs and the future of Bermuda’s tourism industry. What people don’t understand about the receivership scenario is that it is not sustainable and jobs will be lost. Receivers are accountants who have no expertise in operating the companies they manage. They are experts in slashing expenses and know nothing about operating a hotel of Tucker’s Point’s caliber. Rosewood brings expertise to the table along with global brand recognition and operations talent that no receiver could ever dream of.

Take for example that in 2009 we purchased lounge chairs for our Beach Club. Each chair cost us approximately $420. As we look to purchase lounges for the Beach Club this year, we could purchase the exact same lounge that we purchased in 2009 through Rosewood for $202. That’s $218 in savings per chair. When you’re looking at purchasing 100 chairs, $21,800 is a big deal. I’m so sorry, but there is no receiver on the planet that would achieve the same result. This is but one example. Why do you think the Fairmont hotels are still open today? A 600+ room hotel is not easy to maintain in the off-season, but with backers such as Fairmont they seem to get by year after year. With a work force that is 90% Bermudian and with Bermudians such as myself in prominent management positions, what a shame it would be to turn away someone like Rosewood. What a shame it would be for so many Bermudians to lose their livelihoods. I have a family to support.

I wish that those in opposition to the SDO would stop for a minute to consider the people affected by this. Again, I’m so sorry, but if the SDO is not approved, HSBC will not feel the pain that so many of the opposition would like to see. It will be people like me and my 200+ Bermudian colleagues who will suffer the most. This would be but a mere blip on the radar for a global giant such as HSBC should the SDO not pass. For us on the other hand, we will need to begin looking for ways to put food on the table for our children. And in this global economic crisis, that’s much easier said than done. What makes me even more sad are the comments that those in opposition to the SDO have been spreading in attempts to bolster their argument.

Mr. Hayward quoted to the media that there were 2000+ walkers who toured Tucker’s Point property last Sunday. I was there greeting the walkers on Sunday and an accurate count that was conducted showed that there were 909 walkers. I would consider a large error to be +or-10 people, but seriously, where did 2000 come from? Also, as I’m sure you can appreciate, when you grow up in Bermuda and you have a true Bermudian family to raise you, you will learn about every plant and animal that covers this rock. I recall my grandfather’s garden behind the homestead in Somerset. As I walk around Tucker’s Point and look at the land to be developed in the SDO, I see many more Chinese Palms and Casuarinas than I do endemics. Any Bermudian worth his/her weight in gold would tell you that Chinese Palms, Fiddlewoods and Casuarinas are not worth fighting for. They certainly aren’t worth 200+ Bermudians losing their jobs over. As one prominent Bermudian has said in the past, “Let’s not tippy toe through the oleanders here!” The development that Tucker’s Point has done up until this point has been extremely conscious of protecting the environment. There will not be slabs of concrete everywhere and I would venture to say that we will see much more endemics than exist now. Mr. Hayward should be supporting the SDO.

At Sunday’s walk I spoke with one lady who was there to show her opposition to the SDO. Until this day I cannot seem to get over our conversation. She told me that she wanted to see this land saved for her children. I replied that I’d like to be able continue providing for mine. She asked me where I was from. I replied that with the last name Telford, where else would I be from, Somerset of course. I then asked her where she was from. She replied that she was from Canada, well originally Scotland. I’m sure that you’ve heard the comments about the demographics of the participants of Sunday’s walk. I would say that the lady I spoke with in the example above was representative of two thirds of the 909 people who participated in the walk.

My father worked in the Bermuda hotel industry for over 40 years until the day he passed away. Despite all of the barriers that he faced in his career over the years as a black Bermudian, I chose to follow in his footsteps. This is the career I have chosen in order to provide for my family. We already know that not many Bermudians view a career in hospitality as attractive. So many people in Bermuda are so resistant to letting this industry thrive and soar! I was fortunate enough to work with Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts for 7 years and have worked in four and five-star hotels in Washington DC, Mexico and Hawaii. I’ve always wondered why Bermuda has never had a true four or five-star hotel. Is it because every time a company such as Four Seasons or Rosewood shows interest in Bermuda, those who don’t understand this industry find a way to destroy that opportunity? I implore you for once to let someone have the chance to finally help us to achieve four or five star status. We have never been able to do it. How proud my father would be if he could see his son playing a role in something truly monumental in Bermuda’s history.

Bermuda has reached a crossroads. A crucial decision must be made where we must define the future of our tourism product. One thing that makes me truly proud to be Bermudian is that Bermuda has always led the pack when it came to which road to take to the future. Our neighbors in the Caribbean have always followed our lead. First we showed them how it was done in tourism, and then with international business. It is almost un-Bermudian when some of the opposition to the SDO has the audacity to suggest that we follow the Bahamas and lower our prices to fill more hotel rooms. As my father would often say, they have no clue what they’re talking about. Bermuda is tiny. We are alone in the middle of the Atlantic. Yet, we are close to the East coast of the United States and it’s not cheap to get here or stay here. Does it really make much sense to lower our room rates when the air fares will still be high? The cost of living in Bermuda is too high anyway. Who would you find to work in this hotel? If you lower the rates, you’re going to have to lower the wages or cut jobs. The quality of the service will drop, obviously. Why not raise the quality?

How about this for an idea? Bermuda becomes a niche market. Appealing to the rich and wealthy, Bermuda will provide ultra luxury accommodations and experiences, charging the same prices it charges now or even higher. There are actually people out there who have the money to pay our prices. I saw them every day at Four Seasons. They are coming to Tucker’s Point Hotel right now. Do you realize that our hotel was sold out on February 26th this year? We will be sold out for three days in April and in June and July we will be demanding room rates starting in the $700s with average occupancies well over 90 per cent. With the support of a luxury hotel company such as Rosewood, we have access to thousands of our target market consisting of people who are willing to pay top dollar for the luxury experience. With the facilities at Tucker’s Point and the assistance of Rosewood, we could easily become a truly successful five-star hotel in two to three years.

Without the SDO there will be no Rosewood. We would have to forget any of the other significant players such as Four Seasons, Ritz Carlton or Starwood Hotels coming to Bermuda. And there is no other Bermuda property that is five-star. In receivership, the accountants would begin to cut costs and people would lose their jobs. The future of our tourism product would be abysmal. No luxury hotel to speak of and no attraction to come here because there would be nothing different about us than any other island in the Atlantic. Well, yes, maybe we’re more expensive. We have the same nice beaches as the Bahamas and the same blue water. Without the external investment, our island economy would simply degenerate.

This island has only its services to depend on. We have zero production. We have to attract external investment in order to survive. The investors are there and they’re watching us. By showing those outside of Bermuda that we welcome their investment, we will save Bermudian jobs. If we hesitate, we won’t hurt or punish HSBC. We will most certainly hurt or punish a couple hundred Bermudians immediately and the generations to come will see the gradual downfall of tourism in this island. Please don’t believe all of the rhetoric and sensationalism that is out there and please hear the voice of true Bermudians who are depending on your vote for our future. Many Bermudians have given their children better futures by working in the hospitality industry and others have chosen a career in this industry. Like those before us we have the opportunity to define our tourism product for decades to come and lead the pack. Let’s not be followers. We have always been leaders. Let’s make Bermuda a truly five-star product and something that our neighbors wish they could be.”

[Paul Telford studied International Hotel Management at the University of Buckingham in England, worked at the Four Seasons in Washington, D.C. and Punta Mita, Mexico from 2000 to 2006 and is currently the Rooms and Spa Director at Tucker’s Point Hotel & Spa.]

Read More About

Category: All, News

Comments (17)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Terry says:

    So Mr. Telford, your all sold out for three days each month. Fantastic. I did not even read your whole verbage.

    They come, they play at TP and don’t spend a dime elsewhere. I don’t care if they spend $10,000 a day at your place. Outside the gate is what matters.

    And what happened 40 years ago is neither here nor there.

    Today. Use what you have and leave the rest alone.

  2. Mad Prophet says:

    Rhetoric and sensationalism????

    This is about highly value public participation in this political forum.

    This is about freely discovering truth!”

    What truthfully will happen to the ecosystem at TP??”

    We all know what happened to hotels and an the hotel industry.

    This about the “40 thieves” and the PLP bedding down with one another.

    Who would ever have thought……

  3. Terry says:

    Irony is a beach. The new developement will be called “Ching Ching” whilst most will be living in ‘Ling Ling’..

  4. Hmmmmm says:

    “Take for example that in 2009 we purchased lounge chairs for our Beach Club. Each chair cost us approximately $420. As we look to purchase lounges for the Beach Club this year, we could purchase the exact same lounge that we purchased in 2009 through Rosewood for $202. That’s $218 in savings per chair. When you’re looking at purchasing 100 chairs, $21,800 is a big deal.” Sir, why did it take your principals to lose $100 million to figure this out? The arrogance of amateurs who had no respect for the strength of brand names when dealing with the North American market. The country-club plan failed and NOW you turn to a Brand to fix the problem.

  5. Kim Smith says:

    Tucker’s Point have always been aware that portions of their land was protected and so why didn’t they make their development plans with respect to that protection?

    Special Development Orders have been given for that site on two previous occasions (once because Marriott threatened to close the hotel unless they were granted it… and they left anyway!)

    This time the answer should be NO!

  6. US Observer says:

    Mr. Telford – as Hmmm mentioned, you said “Take for example that in 2009 we purchased lounge chairs for our Beach Club. Each chair cost us approximately $420. As we look to purchase lounges for the Beach Club this year, we could purchase the exact same lounge that we purchased in 2009 through Rosewood for $202. That’s $218 in savings per chair. When you’re looking at purchasing 100 chairs, $21,800 is a big deal.

    Where in the world does a lounge chair for the beach cost $420 or even for $202??? Savings??? Whomever sold these to you got over,,,waaay over. Insiders maybe? Sounds like poor purchasing planning and power. However I’m certain the big deal came when someone knew what they were doing when they cut the check for these golden lounge chairs.

  7. Dan Marino says:

    What i’m failing to grasp is, and please feel free to interject if you have the acumen to furnish me; how the hell can a firm like tuckers which is already insolvent by any balance sheet scrutiny and furthermore is running at a negligible occupancy, think that by building more occupancy they will some how magic full occupancy lol. I am laughing as i write this. Its zimbabwe economics

    Native Bermudian please assist?????

  8. W.T.F.??? says:

    MORE Bullcrap!!

    what a waste of Bernew’s site!!

  9. m_m says:

    Best piece of writing on this site in a while. Thanks for your view Paul.
    As for everyone else that commented negatively, I think you should all take a step back and digest what Paul is saying. @US Observer – Clearly you have never bought a piece of quality furniture before.

  10. Jef.Jam says:

    I think this article is definitely food for thought. I would have loved for both sides to have put their cards on the table a few weeks ago to allow the country to fully digest all facts. I believe both sides have valid arguments but opportunities of education for the masses have been missed,and the broken promises of politicians in the past have left a bitter taste in many; thus the huge negative public outcry. I’m still on the fence but I believe this article may be too little too late.

    • My two cents says:

      That’s because it was kept on the down low, hidden, secret from us until about two weeks before debated. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE can’t talk rationally about it. It’s the fault of government and TP, they told us at the last minute and then they expect everyone to be all calm about it??? Give me a break, the idiots did this, this should have been open to the public 6 months ago. They have been losing a MILLION DOLLARS PER MONTH SINCE 2009! They waited til the last minute so they could scare Bermudians into supporting this SDO. All of this has been handled in an appalling way and they actually thought people would by the scaremongering to support it! And then you have people thinking just because they aren’t “allowed on the land” that it won’t affect their environment. It is so funny to me that people actually think that something harmful to one area of the environment won’t affect the whole island. People its 22 square miles, please gain some perspective.

  11. Not buying it says:

    Mr. Telford,

    I’m sorry, your argument just doesn’t wash for me, and I doubt it will wash with many other people either. Why are you, Ed Trippe, and the other supporters of this trying to convince us all that this plan will be the “saving” of Bermuda’s tourism industry? The industry has been on a downward spiral for a while now – why do you believe that a 70 new hotel rooms and residences are going to change that? The problem here goes deeper than that.

    You already pointed out part of the problem – Bermuda is just too expensive. And what you pay for is not worth what you’re getting. You ask, does it make sense to lower room rates when air fare is still high? Have you forgotten about all the low-cost airlines that have been set up over the past year or two? You can get to Bda cheaply enough – but what are you getting when you come here?

    If TP has been having sold out nights, why do you claim to be losing over a million a month? That just doesn’t add up to me.

    You dump on the Bahamas, but maybe you need to check out what their doing down south. The Atlantis Resort there is fabulous, better than anything that TP can offer a tourist. Why? Because it doesn’t cater to just the wealthy individual – it caters to the whole family. It’s the type of all-inclusive, fun resort people are looking for. You can get a cheap vacation package there for a fraction of what you charge at TP.

    Time to change your ethos, Mr. Telford. Come up with a better way to do business. Cause it looks like TP is going down, and I don’t see why our arable land has to go down with you.

  12. Al says:

    It’s obvious. If they have sold out nights but are losing millions per year then the problem is not the hotel but the financial structure.

  13. Chapa says:

    They have probably been sold out because they have been offering rooms at
    $100 per night to members.

    Also, there were Rosewood people on the island in November who mentioned negotiations relating to TPC with Dr. Brown.

    So, indeed this SDO negotiation has been going on for some time despite
    denials when Stuart Hayward first brought it to public attention.

    As a member of TPC I have used the Spa facilities – my experience, and that of my guest, was so poor compared to other spas on the island, that we have never used the facility again. Far from 5 star quality.

  14. Seriously?! says:

    TPC is the victim of gross mismanagement by people who don’t know what they’re doing. If they can’t fill the hotel rooms they have now, what is building new rooms going to accomplish. The people who want this SDO just want to get their investment back. It’s all about money – not for the greater good of Bermuda and her people. Thank goodness for people like Stuart Hayward and BEST. This SDO is a farce.

  15. Pnk says:

    So let me get this straight Mr. Telford.

    If TPC don’t get this SDO;

    - you will never be able to work in the tourism industry again (your livelihood)
    - you will not be able to feed your children
    - foreign investors will not invest in Bermuda
    - the entire Bermudian tourism industry will come to a stand still
    - the receivers will cut 200+ Bermuda jobs from TPC

    ohhh and one more …………….almost forgot
    - TPC will not be able to buy its expensive outdoor furniture at discounted prices

    Does that about sum up your argument Mr. Telford?

    I would say at a minimum you are being disingenuous Mr. Telford and somewhat patronizing’s and insulting to the readership of this website. Like Mr. Trippe arguments your assumption in writing such an article is that we will swallow your emotive plea is also somewhat arrogant.

    As a Bermudian who claims to be passionate about seeing this Island succeed I encourage you to do a little more soul searching yourself Mr. Telford – consider the financial dire straights that your employer is in and the sacrifice that TPC is asking this country to make to bail them out of this position? Are you willing to continue to back that horse when all signs are that it is lame? Your call Mr. Telford! Your call!

  16. Václav Pinkava says:

    Here’s an emotive pseudo-argument for comparison:

    “Suppose there are three human qualities. The trouble is, if you have any two of them, you cannot have the third. They are:
    1. Being Smart
    2. Being Honest
    3. Being a supporter of the Tucker’s Point SDO”

    Work that one out. No harm meant, but the situation is too serious to avoid some degree of ridicule. There’s a saying, “you have to either laugh, or cry.”