Three Vehicle Collisions In Hamilton Parish

February 5, 2018

A 57-year-old woman is in hospital following a three vehicle collision in Hamilton parish on Saturday, while a 62-year-old woman has been treated and discharged from hospital following a collision that also occurred in Hamilton parish on Friday.

Three Vehicle Collision: Blue Hole Hill, Hamilton Parish on Saturday

A police spokesperson said, “Around 4:30pm Saturday, February 3rd police and first responders attended a reported three vehicle collision on Blue Hole Hill in Hamilton parish, near the junction with Wilkinson Avenue.

“It appears that a truck and two cars were involved, in the vicinity of Swizzle Inn – with the female driver of one of the cars, believed to be a 57 year old St. George’s woman, being transported to King Edward VII Memorial Hospital via ambulance as a precaution.

“There were no other injuries reported and at last check this morning [February 5th], the injured 57 year old woman was recovering in stable condition on a general ward at the hospital.

“All three vehicles were damaged and inquiries continue. Any witnesses are asked to contact the main police telephone number 295-0011.”

Three Vehicle Collision: North Shore Road, Hamilton Parish on Friday

A police spokesperson said, “Around 3:30pm Friday, February 2nd police and first responders attended a reported three vehicle collision on North Shore Road in Hamilton parish, near the junction with My Lord’s Bay Road.

“It appears that a truck and two cars traveling in the same direction were involved – with the female driver of one of the cars, believed to be a 62 year old Hamilton parish woman, being transported to King Edward VII Memorial Hospital via ambulance.

“At last check this morning [February 5th], the injured 62 year old woman had been treated and discharged from hospital.

“All three vehicles were damaged and inquiries continue. Any witnesses are asked to contact the main police telephone number 295-0011.”

Police Tweet Video

The Police RPU account tweeted the video below on February 3rd, saying, “Lots of damage at a collision on Crawl Hill this afternoon. Straight stretch of road – how do you crash?”

Read More About

Category: Accidents and fires, All, News

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. sage says:

    The Police RPU account tweeted the video below on February 3rd, saying, “Lots of damage at a collision on Crawl Hill this afternoon. Straight stretch of road – how do you crash?” Uh, ask yourselves, how did two police bikes crash on Frog Lane straight or rearend a car on the causeway?

  2. Toodle-oo says:

    Those damn bikers .. oops

  3. Know the Facts says:

    @sage – police bike collision on Frog Lane, caused when one bike turned across the path of the other in a training evercise. Police bike that rear ended a car on the Causeway was caused because the car had defective brake lights.

    • Lofl says:

      So because the frog lane situation was an exercise, that gives the BPS a free pass for having Non Riders….#tryagain…oh and btw if joker wasn’t riding like a jack@$$ on the causeway he would have saw traffic slowing. #justsaying

    • Ok says:

      So that makes their comments acceptable? What if something similar happened here….

    • sage says:

      So they were at fault then and that is how crashes happen on a straight road, thanks for clearing that up. Defective brakelights? That’s a good one, the bike was too close so was at fault. Turning across the path of another motorcycle means a lot more training is needed, also Know it all, were “due care” tickets issued, like they love to throw around for third laning? Or were they just let off with zero consequences like the two cops who drove the wrong way down Church street all on cctv, and were found in a bar and the responding officers did nothing either?

    • walls says:

      Just because it was a training exercise, it doesn’t or shouldn’t absolve officers from riding safely on the roads. Was the officer who turned onto the path of the other charged with due care?

      In what way were the brake lights defective, was it because the center brake light was missing with the aftermarket spoiler despite the other two still in operation? Regardless even if all brake lights were defective, the onus is still on the following vehicle to keep clear and blame would still be apportioned 2/3 to the rear vehicle.

    • Rockfish#1and#2 says:

      Lol.

  4. Cocolizo says:

    How is the Mass attendance at your parish compared to a few years back? How is the charitable giving in your parish? Are finances frequently in the black or is your parish finance committee frequently wondering how the bills are going to get paid in the next quarter? If your finances are in good shape, how about the average age of your parish membership?